2015
DOI: 10.1016/j.media.2015.04.015
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Discriminative dictionary learning for abdominal multi-organ segmentation

Abstract: An automated segmentation method is presented for multi-organ segmentation in abdominal CT images. Dictionary learning and sparse coding techniques are used in the proposed method to generate target specific priors for segmentation. The method simultaneously learns dictionaries which have reconstructive power and classifiers which have discriminative ability from a set of selected atlases. Based on the learnt dictionaries and classifiers, probabilistic atlases are then generated to provide priors for the segme… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

2
109
0

Year Published

2015
2015
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
6
3

Relationship

3
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 145 publications
(111 citation statements)
references
References 27 publications
2
109
0
Order By: Relevance
“…We do this as MALP is an application that inherently requires establishing correspondences between images in order to propagate labels. Most state-of-the-art methods in MALP such as in [13,11] use affine registration as a first step to give an initial set of dense correspondences between the atlases and the target image before proceeding with a more sophisticated label propagation scheme. Although affine registration is less accurate than doing non-rigid registration, it is used because it is more efficient.…”
Section: Experiments and Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…We do this as MALP is an application that inherently requires establishing correspondences between images in order to propagate labels. Most state-of-the-art methods in MALP such as in [13,11] use affine registration as a first step to give an initial set of dense correspondences between the atlases and the target image before proceeding with a more sophisticated label propagation scheme. Although affine registration is less accurate than doing non-rigid registration, it is used because it is more efficient.…”
Section: Experiments and Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Qualitative evaluation of the estimated correspondences in a simple multi-atlas propagation setting demonstrate the potential of using SVFs for estimating correspondences. We do not apply any further post-processing to improve the segmentation, such as graph-cuts, which is what is typically done in some state-of-the-art methods for segmenting abdominal datasets [13,11]. Random forests are extremely efficient during test time making them an attractive option to use for estimating correspondences in large datasets.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The probabilistic output from the forest was then used as the unary cost for graph-cut to regularise the output. Apart from poor results for the pancreas, which is difficult to segment due to its extremely deformable nature, the liver, kidney and spleen obtain good segmentation results, excluding a few outlier cases (a fully-supervised method [15] applied on the same dataset obtains a dice overlap of 94.9%, 93.6%, and 92.5% for liver, kidneys, and spleen, respectively.). Our method could potentially be used to provide coarse segmentation or mine a large dataset of medical images, with extremely minimal user input.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This has led to the development of numerous patch-based segmentation approaches, including several from our own group. These methods currently provide state-of-theart performance in many applications including brain ], heart [Bai et al (2013)] and abdominal organ segmentation Tong et al (2015)]. …”
Section: Semantic Imagingmentioning
confidence: 99%