2022
DOI: 10.1016/j.ab.2022.114898
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Discriminative electrochemical biosensing of wildtype and omicron variant of SARS-CoV-2 nucleocapsid protein with single platform

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2023
2023
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 16 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 31 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Clinical sera from actual patients were used to demonstrate the effectiveness of this electrochemical sensor, and the results showed a LOD of 1 ng/mL. Electrochemical biosensors were created by Liv et al [72] using EDC:NHS functionalized GO and modified glassy carbon electrodes in combination with wildtype and omicron SARS-CoV-2 nucleocapsid antibodies. These biosensors were able to detect the antigen in nasopharyngeal swab samples, and the lowest detection levels were 0.76 and 0.24 ag/mL for wildtype and omicron SARS-CoV-2 nucleocapsid antigen protein, respectively.…”
Section: Using Graphene Oxidementioning
confidence: 99%
“…Clinical sera from actual patients were used to demonstrate the effectiveness of this electrochemical sensor, and the results showed a LOD of 1 ng/mL. Electrochemical biosensors were created by Liv et al [72] using EDC:NHS functionalized GO and modified glassy carbon electrodes in combination with wildtype and omicron SARS-CoV-2 nucleocapsid antibodies. These biosensors were able to detect the antigen in nasopharyngeal swab samples, and the lowest detection levels were 0.76 and 0.24 ag/mL for wildtype and omicron SARS-CoV-2 nucleocapsid antigen protein, respectively.…”
Section: Using Graphene Oxidementioning
confidence: 99%
“…While certain electrochemical sensors have been proposed and are in the works. These sensors identify specific biomarkers or antigens linked with COVID viruses and the detected signal is analysed and interpreted to determine the existence or concentration of SARS-CoV-2-associated biomarkers [ [52] , [53] , [54] , [55] ].
Fig.
…”
Section: Potential Sensing Systems For Diagnosing Respiratory Infectionsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…SARS‐CoV‐2 virus has evolved through unique mutations of the coronavirus variants worldwide [4,5] . Several biomarkers, namely spike (S) protein, nucleocapsid (N) protein, receptor binding domain (RBD), RNA genome and antibodies, have been reported previously in the literature for the early detection of SARS‐CoV‐2 [6–13] …”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…[4,5] Several biomarkers, namely spike (S) protein, nucleocapsid (N) protein, receptor binding domain (RBD), RNA genome and antibodies, have been reported previously in the literature for the early detection of SARS-CoV-2. [6][7][8][9][10][11][12][13] To date, several analytical diagnostic methods for SARS-CoV-2 detection have been implemented, such as the real-time reverse transcriptase polymerase chain reaction (RT-PCR) to detect the virus genomic structure and enzyme-linked immuno-sorbent assay (ELISA) for antibodies detection against viral antigens in the human body. [14,15] Given their high sensitivity, these techniques are costly, have low reproducibility, produce false-negative or positive results and are unsuitable for point of care (POC) use in homes or clinics.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%