Discursive constructions of family functions in forensic psychiatry: A critical ethnographic perspective

Abstract

Significant barriers remain regarding the implementation of family-centred approaches in the domain of forensic psychiatry despite their effectiveness at increasing adherence to treatment, improving attendance to medical appointments, decreasing readmission rates and reducing episodes of relapse. We attribute these barriers to a fundamental gap in our understanding of the family function and its role within the forensic psychiatric system. Despite requesting to be included and considered as partners, some families feel excluded and sidelined, which causes distress, incomprehension and disengagement. We approached this tension at the discursive level through a critical ethnography of the Review Board and the work of Foucault on psychiatric power, which provided us with a unique opportunity to understand how the role of families are constructed and sustained in the Canadian forensic psychiatric system. To do so, we mobilized data stemming from ethnographic observations and documentary artifacts entitled ‘reasons for disposition’. Data analysis allowed us to identify two discursive constructions of familial functions: (1) families as repositories of information and (2) families as supervisory agents. These results have implications for health care professionals and administrators in forensic psychiatry who are increasingly adhering to family-centred care models without questioning what such care or what such family engagement entails.

Combining Critical Ethnography and Critical Discourse Analysis in Mental Health Nursing Research

“…), both have extensive clinical experience in mental healthcare settings. This article draws on their experiences combining critical ethnography and CDA as part of their PhD thesis research studies (Domingue, 2021; Jager, 2021). Research ethics board approval was obtained for both studies.…”