2019
DOI: 10.1080/13563467.2019.1639147
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Discursive Contestation on Technological Innovation and the Institutional Design of the UNFCCC in the New Climate Change Regime

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
8
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 14 publications
(8 citation statements)
references
References 22 publications
0
8
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The IPCC and UNFCCC are responsible for pledging 197 countries (as on December 2015) to take the responsibility to stabilize the greenhouse CO 2 gas concentration in the atmosphere at a level that would prevent dangerous anthropogenic interference with the climatic system. Furthermore, for example, according to IPCC and UNFCCC by 2030, the European Union (EU) has to meet ≥27% of their primary energy requirement from the renewable energy resources, which ensures up to 40% reduction in greenhouse gas (GHGs) emissions in comparison to 1990 levels [235][236][237][238][239]. Today, EU gets about 50% of its primary energy from imported fossil fuels.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The IPCC and UNFCCC are responsible for pledging 197 countries (as on December 2015) to take the responsibility to stabilize the greenhouse CO 2 gas concentration in the atmosphere at a level that would prevent dangerous anthropogenic interference with the climatic system. Furthermore, for example, according to IPCC and UNFCCC by 2030, the European Union (EU) has to meet ≥27% of their primary energy requirement from the renewable energy resources, which ensures up to 40% reduction in greenhouse gas (GHGs) emissions in comparison to 1990 levels [235][236][237][238][239]. Today, EU gets about 50% of its primary energy from imported fossil fuels.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Further, responses to this variable is of relevance to the "Green Governmentalism" climate change discourse indicating the individuals' disposition toward committing their countries to international environmental agreements, compatible with notions of global governance and preference toward multilateral international approach and commitment in dealing with common global problems such as climate change [29,59]. Governments have a central role in the green governmental paradigm, "adopting science and technology push-policies to fund formal R&D and pull-policies to generate demands for climate technologies by traditional regulatory measures" [95]. Inclusion of this measure thus allows for explanation on "public opinion towards making international agreements such as the Kyoto Protocol in order to regulate environmental problems, and persuading their citizens that bind their countries in environmental measures that are costly to them" [29].…”
Section: Appendix B Further Information On Variablesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A discourse is 'a web of meanings, ideas, interactions and practices that are expressed or represented in texts (spoken and written language, gesture, and visual imagery), within institutional and everyday settings' [17, p.129]. Multiple discourses exist and, for those who subscribe to them, constitute 'a shared way of apprehending the world' [18, p.9], containing a 'storyline' [15] that gives a particular pattern of meaning to social and physical phenomena [19,20]. An important concept for this paper is the 'discourse coalition', defined as an ensemble of actors that, for diverse reasons, are attracted to specific storylines and engage in practices that reproduce those storylines [15].…”
Section: Conceptual Frameworkmentioning
confidence: 99%