DISCUSS: A Soft Computing Approach to Spatial Disaggregation in Economic Evaluation of Public Policies

Abstract

For more than three decades cost‐benefit analysis (CBA) has been used in many countries as an important tool for evaluating public policies. More recently, participation of stakeholders in CBA processes has become an important issue for governments. However, CBA by itself does not provide a good environment for stakeholder participation. A major reason for this is the lack of spatial disaggregation in traditional CBA. In order to allow greater public participation, a GIS‐based approach is proposed. This approach uses a Geocomputational system, which incorporates soft computing theory with expert systems in a geographic information systems (GIS) environment. It is designed to generate representations of environmental, economic and social policy outcomes according to the perceptions of the stakeholders and after the CBA results have been obtained. The methodology proposed for modelling impacts in cases where uncertainty exists uses the soft computing theory of fuzzy logic to generate a raster map based on spatial inputs provided by the stakeholders involved in the decision process. This computer‐based system, called DISCUSS (Decision Information System for Community Understanding of Spatial Scenarios), is intended for situations where the government chooses to evaluate a policy using CBA and desires to encourage public participation in evaluating the results identified by the economic methodology. DISCUSS and the maps that it produces are being tested in a public participation case study with long‐term impacts over a large area of south‐eastern Australia.

Multicriteria Decision Analysis in Geographic Information Science

“…Such imprecisely defined sets of objects are called fuzzy sets . For example, there have been a number of applications aiming at implementing fuzzy forms of the WLC model (e.g., Paez et al 2006;Vadrevu et al 2010), AHP (e.g., Anagnostopoulos and Vavatsikos 2012;Kordi and Brandt 2012), compromise programming (Simonovic and Nirupama 2005), and PROM-ETHEE (e.g., Chou et al 2007). There are two main types of approaches for performing a combination of linguistic information: approximation and symbolic methods (Malczewski 2002).…”

Exploring landscape changes using an envisioning system in rural community workshops

“…In some instances the local people may be better able to identify the spatial implications of local land use changes than any available model. Some mechanism to allow for input of local knowledge is also desirable (Paez et al, 2006).…”