2006
DOI: 10.1002/jhm.110
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Discussing resuscitation preferences with patients: Challenges and rewards

Abstract: This paper was submitted on behalf of the Palliative Care Task Force.Discussing preferences regarding resuscitation is a challenging and important task for any physician. Understanding patients' wishes at the end of life allows physicians to provide the type of care patients want, to avoid unwanted interventions, and to promote patient autonomy and dignity. Hospitalists face an even greater challenge because they are often meeting a patient for the first time in a crisis situation. Despite the frequency with w… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
23
0

Year Published

2006
2006
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
5
1
1

Relationship

1
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 33 publications
(24 citation statements)
references
References 70 publications
(49 reference statements)
1
23
0
Order By: Relevance
“…First, residents were divided into groups of six or seven learners and taught key components of a CSD as described in the literature and by expert consensus. [15][16][17] Two hospice and palliative medicine faculty members (KN and ES) were preceptors. Seminars lasted 2 hours and content included: 1) defining advance care planning, 2) understanding the indications for a CSD, 3) reviewing a framework for these discussions, and 4) exploring strategies for responding to patient emotions.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…First, residents were divided into groups of six or seven learners and taught key components of a CSD as described in the literature and by expert consensus. [15][16][17] Two hospice and palliative medicine faculty members (KN and ES) were preceptors. Seminars lasted 2 hours and content included: 1) defining advance care planning, 2) understanding the indications for a CSD, 3) reviewing a framework for these discussions, and 4) exploring strategies for responding to patient emotions.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…20 The checklist was created by a panel of three hospice and palliative medicine physicians and four communication skills experts, based on previous work, 6,13 and expert recommendation regarding essential elements of patient-centered CSD communication. 7,[15][16][17] The checklist had three sections: 1) patient-centered interviewing skills, 2) CSD skills, and 3) responding to emotion. Each checklist item was scored dichotomously (i.e., done correctly or done incorrectly), assigned one point when performed correctly, and given equal weight.…”
Section: Outcomes and Measurementsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It is best to frame these difficult discussions in the context of established goals and values of the child and family [64]. Inquiring about the perceived health status of the child is a useful way to introduce the discussion.…”
Section: Advance Care Planningmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The care of seriously ill patients and those approaching the end of life can be challenging and richly rewarding [17]. Working with Mrs Morton and her family to help ease her respiratory distress; pausing the resuscitation long enough to understand her preferences for care; providing support, compassion, and empathy to her family; and implementing a plan consistent with her wishes allow the clinicians to use their heart as well as their head to provide the best possible care to patients and their families.…”
Section: Rewarding Practicementioning
confidence: 99%