2011
DOI: 10.1680/mpal.2011.164.4.209
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Discussion: Fidic’s Red Book 1999 edition: a study review

Abstract: Freelance procurement expert, Bucharest, Romania Contribution by Peter M. ElliottWith reference to Hillig et al. (2010) I suggest that it would have been more appropriate to compare the Fidic '99 suite of contracts with NEC3, rather than the Joint Contracts Tribunal (JCT) contracts, as NEC3 is designed for civil engineering works as is Fidic '99. Furthermore, the suite should be considered as a whole, including the recent Gold Book, rather than concentrating on one form. Clauses from different documents in the… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...

Citation Types

0
0
0

Publication Types

Select...

Relationship

0
0

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 0 publications
references
References 1 publication
0
0
0
Order By: Relevance

No citations

Set email alert for when this publication receives citations?