2007
DOI: 10.1007/s11764-007-0019-9
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Discussion of fertility preservation with newly diagnosed patients: oncologists’ views

Abstract: Physicians should consider providing patients with timely, understandable information related to their FP options, prior to the administration of treatment. Such discussions may lead to improved quality of life for individuals as they transition from patients to survivors.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

7
237
1
1

Year Published

2009
2009
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
10

Relationship

1
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 230 publications
(246 citation statements)
references
References 21 publications
7
237
1
1
Order By: Relevance
“…The success rates of these options range from 5 to 25% . Despite an increasing number of studies and guidelines demonstrating the need for discussion of FP issues with cancer patients, information provision about treatment-induced infertility and FP techniques and referral for FP are still not sufficient and often provided too late (Dunn & Steginga, 2000;Jenninga, Hilders, Louwe, & Peters, 2008;Nakayama et al, 2009;Quinn et al, 2007;Rosen, Rodriguez-Wallberg, & Rosenzweig, 2009;Thewes et al, 2005;Tschudin & Bitzer, 2009). …”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The success rates of these options range from 5 to 25% . Despite an increasing number of studies and guidelines demonstrating the need for discussion of FP issues with cancer patients, information provision about treatment-induced infertility and FP techniques and referral for FP are still not sufficient and often provided too late (Dunn & Steginga, 2000;Jenninga, Hilders, Louwe, & Peters, 2008;Nakayama et al, 2009;Quinn et al, 2007;Rosen, Rodriguez-Wallberg, & Rosenzweig, 2009;Thewes et al, 2005;Tschudin & Bitzer, 2009). …”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Unfortunately, these issues are still not routinely addressed by most physicians. 5,9 It is known that the rate of treatment-induced infertilityincreaseswithmoreaggressivechemotherapy. [10][11][12][13][14] However, there still are many open questions about the probability of amenorrhea, reduced ovarian reserve, and infertility after distinct chemotherapies and the impact of age at treatment onset, as well as about the chance of recovery and the risk of suffering from symptoms of hypogonadism.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Many barriers have been identified, including a lack of knowledge about fertility preservation options 44 and available local resources 45,46 , and the perception that assisted reproductive technologies are cost-prohibitive and of limited efficacy 47,48 . The constraints of time and concern about cancer treatment delay are also cited, but early involvement of the fertility specialist is critical for the provision of timely fertility preservation services 49,50 .…”
Section: Guidelines Early Access To Care and Barriers To Referralmentioning
confidence: 99%