1999
DOI: 10.1061/(asce)0733-9429(1999)125:2(210)
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Discussion of “Irrotational Flow and Real Fluid Effects under Planar Sluice Gates” by J. S. Montes

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
4
0

Year Published

2001
2001
2015
2015

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 9 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
0
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…(2) are based on the total depth v, not the jet depth v2. In this study, y, and 13 were measured, and Y2 was taken as the gate opening w, multiplied by a contraction coefficient, C.. For planar, sharp-edged, vertical, and rectangular sluice gates, C is remarkably constant, with a value of about 0.61 (Henderson 1966;Montes 1997;Webby 1999). Considerations about the value of C in gates differing from the planar sharpedged gate will be introduced in the Results section.…”
Section: Sluice Gatementioning
confidence: 99%
“…(2) are based on the total depth v, not the jet depth v2. In this study, y, and 13 were measured, and Y2 was taken as the gate opening w, multiplied by a contraction coefficient, C.. For planar, sharp-edged, vertical, and rectangular sluice gates, C is remarkably constant, with a value of about 0.61 (Henderson 1966;Montes 1997;Webby 1999). Considerations about the value of C in gates differing from the planar sharpedged gate will be introduced in the Results section.…”
Section: Sluice Gatementioning
confidence: 99%
“…The experiments at Tepako Canal and Arapun Spillway showed that C c was in the range of 0.648~0.724 for radial sluice gates (Webby 1999). In addition, the experiments by Benjamin showed that C c ranged from 0.60~0.75 and decreased gradually with decreasing b/E 1 to approach a value around 0.61.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The first series contain 451 data sets which were gathered from multi-radial gates under operation in 10 irrigation canals in the United States (Buyalski, 1983). The second series comprise seven sets which were reported by Webby (1999) and were gathered from four large radial gates with equal openings. Finally, 56 data sets recorded by Safarinezhad (1991) in the Doroodzan irrigation network of Iran were utilised.…”
Section: Field Datamentioning
confidence: 99%