1979
DOI: 10.1061/jeegav.0000903
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Discussion of “Laboratory Studies of Gas Tracers for Reaeration”

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

1980
1980
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
4
2

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 7 publications
(1 citation statement)
references
References 0 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In this subsection, the values of obtained by different reaeration equations are compared with the values of estimated in this study and their performance is considered. The result showed that the predicative equations developed by Thackston & Krenkel [6], Churchill et al [7], Tsivoglou & Wallace [8], Krenkel & Orlob [9], Owens et al [10] and Smoot [11] were not suitable for this study, since the predicted reaeration constant did not show an agreement with the measured values. The value obtained from the equation proposed by Jha et al [12] showed the best agreement with the measured values.…”
Section: H Predictive Reaeration Equationsmentioning
confidence: 87%
“…In this subsection, the values of obtained by different reaeration equations are compared with the values of estimated in this study and their performance is considered. The result showed that the predicative equations developed by Thackston & Krenkel [6], Churchill et al [7], Tsivoglou & Wallace [8], Krenkel & Orlob [9], Owens et al [10] and Smoot [11] were not suitable for this study, since the predicted reaeration constant did not show an agreement with the measured values. The value obtained from the equation proposed by Jha et al [12] showed the best agreement with the measured values.…”
Section: H Predictive Reaeration Equationsmentioning
confidence: 87%