1983
DOI: 10.1520/gtj10847j
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Discussion of “The Modified Borehole Shear Device” by J. P. Demartinecourt and G. E. Bauer

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
44
0

Year Published

2012
2012
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 37 publications
(44 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
0
44
0
Order By: Relevance
“…1 Finally, we explored the possibility that intergroup emotions and threat may mediate the joint effects of provocation, outgroup entitativity, and negative mood on aggression. Monte Carlo estimation (employed due to the nested structure of the data; Selig & Preacher, 2008) did not provide support for mediation, even when we considered only the provocation condition. 1 In alternative analyses, we unpacked the 3-way interaction based on the provocation manipulation.…”
Section: Aggressionmentioning
confidence: 93%
“…1 Finally, we explored the possibility that intergroup emotions and threat may mediate the joint effects of provocation, outgroup entitativity, and negative mood on aggression. Monte Carlo estimation (employed due to the nested structure of the data; Selig & Preacher, 2008) did not provide support for mediation, even when we considered only the provocation condition. 1 In alternative analyses, we unpacked the 3-way interaction based on the provocation manipulation.…”
Section: Aggressionmentioning
confidence: 93%
“…We tested for mediation using the joint significance test (i.e., significant paths between the independent variable and the mediator, and the mediator and the dependent variable after controlling for the independent variable) (MacKinnon, Lockwood, Hoffman, West, & Sheets, 2002). We tested the significance of the indirect effect using Selig and Preacher's (2008) Monte Carlo Method for Assessing Mediation (MCMAM), which produces indirect effect confidence intervals based on 20,000…”
Section: Analysis Strategymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Next, we run an SUR that includes an equation, where the independent variable predicts the mediator, and another equation, where the mediator and the independent variable predict the dependent variable at the same time. Finally, the coefficients from these equations are utilized to formally test for the significance of the indirect effect using Monte Carlo simulation (Selig & Preacher, 2008). If the indirect effect is significantly different than zero, we conclude a mediation effect.…”
Section: Sur and Mediation Analysesmentioning
confidence: 99%