Search citation statements
Paper Sections
Citation Types
Year Published
Publication Types
Relationship
Authors
Journals
This report includes discussions of elastic and viscoelastic models for water‐saturated porous media, and measurements and computations of elastic constants including compressibility, incompressibility (bulk modulus), rigidity (shear modulus), Lamé's constant, Poisson's ratio, density, and compressional‐ and shear‐wave velocity. The sediments involved are from three major physiographic provinces in the North Pacific and adjacent areas: continental terrace (shelf and slope), abyssal plain (turbidite), and abyssal hill (pelagic). It is concluded that for small stresses (such as from a sound wave), water‐saturated sediments respond elastically, and that the elastic equations of the Hookean model can be used to compute unmeasured elastic constants. However, to account for wave attenuation, the favored model is ‘nearly elastic,’ or linear viscoelastic. In this model the rigidity modulus μ and Lamé's constant λ in the equations of elasticity, are replaced by complex Lamé constants (μ + iμ′) and (λ + iλ′), which are independent of frequency; μ and λ represent elastic response (as in the Hookean model), and iμ′ and iλ′ represent damping of wave energy. This model implies that wave velocities and the specific dissipation function 1/Q are independent of frequency, and attenuation in decibels per unit length varies linearly with frequency in the range from a few hertz to the megahertz range. The components of the water‐mineral system bulk modulus are porosity, the bulk modulus of pore water, an aggregate bulk modulus of mineral grains, and a bulk modulus of the structure, or frame, formed by the mineral grains. Good values of these components are available in the literature, except for the frame bulk modulus. A relationship between porosity and dynamic frame bulk modulus was established that allowed computation of a system bulk modulus that was used with measured values of density and compressional‐wave velocity to compute other elastic constants. Some average laboratory values for common sediment types are given. The underlying methods of computation should apply to any water‐saturated sediment. If this is so, values given in this paper predict elastic constants for the major sediment types.
The objectives of this paper are to review and study selected measurements of the velocity of shear waves at various depths in some principal types of unlithified, water‐saturated sediments, and to discuss probable variations of shear velocity as a function of pressure and depth in the sea floor. Because of the lack of data for the full range of marine sediments, data from measurements on land were used, and the study was confined to the two “end‐member” sediment types (sand and silt‐clays) and turbidites. The shear velocity data in sands included 29 selected in‐situ measurements at depths to 12 m. The regression equation for these data is: [Formula: see text], where [Formula: see text] is shear‐wave velocity in m/sec, and D is depth in meters. The data from field and laboratory studies indicate that shear‐wave velocity is proportional to the 1/3 to 1/6 power of pressure or depth in sands; that the 1/6 power is not reached until very high pressures are applied; and that in most sand bodies the velocity of shear waves is proportional to the 3/10 to 1/4 power of depth or pressure. The use of a depth exponent of 0.25 is recommended for prediction of shear velocity versus depth in sands. The shear velocity data in silt‐clays and turbidites include 47 selected in‐situ measurements at depths to 650 m. Three linear equations are used to characterize the data. The equation for the 0 to 40 m interval [Formula: see text] indicates the gradient [Formula: see text] to be 4 to 5 times greater than is the compressional velocity gradient in this interval in comparable sediments. At deeper depths, shear velocity gradients are [Formula: see text] from 40 to 120 m, and [Formula: see text] from 120 to 650 m. These deeper gradients are comparable to those of compressional wave velocities. These shear velocity gradients can be used as a basis for predicting shear velocity versus depth.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.
customersupport@researchsolutions.com
10624 S. Eastern Ave., Ste. A-614
Henderson, NV 89052, USA
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.
Copyright © 2025 scite LLC. All rights reserved.
Made with 💙 for researchers
Part of the Research Solutions Family.