2002
DOI: 10.1111/1467-9531.00111
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Discussion: Segregation Indices and Their Functional Inputs

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
33
0
4

Year Published

2005
2005
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
6
2

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 50 publications
(37 citation statements)
references
References 19 publications
0
33
0
4
Order By: Relevance
“…There have been major advancements in the methods available for comparative segregation analysis in the last decade (for reviews, see Grannis 2002;Reardon 2006;Peach 2009;Holloway, Wright, and Ellis 2012). Before discussing the methods adopted in our study, a few words should be said about the main strands of research on segregation patterns; two in particular stand out (Simpson and Peach 2009;Holloway, Wright, and Ellis 2012): (1) the index-based approach, which dates back to the 1940s, and (2) the more recent "raw data" approach, which highlights the extent to which different ethnic and racial (socioeconomic) groups share residential neighborhoods.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…There have been major advancements in the methods available for comparative segregation analysis in the last decade (for reviews, see Grannis 2002;Reardon 2006;Peach 2009;Holloway, Wright, and Ellis 2012). Before discussing the methods adopted in our study, a few words should be said about the main strands of research on segregation patterns; two in particular stand out (Simpson and Peach 2009;Holloway, Wright, and Ellis 2012): (1) the index-based approach, which dates back to the 1940s, and (2) the more recent "raw data" approach, which highlights the extent to which different ethnic and racial (socioeconomic) groups share residential neighborhoods.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The former relies on single-number measures that summarize the level of segregation and intermixing in a given city or region-the term segregation thus applies only at the level of an entire city or region (Reardon 2006). Even though the indexes of dissimilarity and segregation are still most common, there are more than thirty other indexes in use (Grannis 2002) that relate to different dimensions of segregation (Massey and Denton 1988). The more recent raw data approach is mainly concerned with the extent to which particular groups share residential neighborhoods, rather than with the extent to which groups live apart from one another.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The segregation literature has a similar baseline model based upon randomness in which residents are randomly distributed across the neighborhoods within a city (Grannis 2002;Massey and Denton 1993). Then, the observed distribution of households across the neighborhoods of the city is compared with this baseline to assess the degree of segregation.…”
Section: Baseline Modelsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The lack of detailed information on the patterns and trends in segregation at a range of geographic scales is due to the fact that most existing studies rely primarily on aspatial measures of segregation—measures that were developed prior to the availability of geographical information system (GIS) software and that consequently do not fully account for spatial distributions of race and poverty (for discussion and exceptions, see Dawkins, 2006; Grannis, 2002; Reardon & O'Sullivan, 2004; White, 1983; Wong, 1997, 1999, 2004). Reliance on aspatial measures has two principal drawbacks: first, it ignores the proximity of census tracts to one another; and second, it results in segregation measures that are sensitive only to segregation at the (arbitrary) geographic scale of census tracts (or blocks, etc).…”
Section: Prior Research On Trends In Racial Residential Segregationmentioning
confidence: 99%