Disease burden of foodborne pathogens in the Netherlands, 2009

Abstract

To inform risk management decisions on control, prevention and surveillance of foodborne disease, the disease burden of foodborne pathogens is estimated using Disability Adjusted Life Years as a summary metric of public health. Fourteen pathogens that can be transmitted by food are included in the study (four infectious bacteria, three toxin-producing bacteria, four viruses and three protozoa). Data represent the burden in the Netherlands in 2009. The incidence of community-acquired non-consulting cases, patients consulting their general practitioner, those admitted to hospital, as well as the incidence of sequelae and fatal cases is estimated using surveillance data, cohort studies and published data. Disease burden includes estimates of duration and disability weights for non-fatal cases and loss of statistical life expectancy for fatal cases. Results at pathogen level are combined with data from an expert survey to assess the fraction of cases attributable to food, and the main food groups contributing to transmission. Among 1.8 million cases of disease (approx. 10,600 per 100,000) and 233 deaths (1.4 per 100,000) by these fourteen pathogens, approximately one-third (680,000 cases; 4100 per 100,000) and 78 deaths (0.5 per 100,000) are attributable to foodborne transmission. The total burden is 13,500 DALY (82 DALY per 100,000). On a population level, Toxoplasma gondii, thermophilic Campylobacter spp., rotaviruses, noroviruses and Salmonella spp. cause the highest disease burden. The burden per case is highest for perinatal listeriosis and congenital toxoplasmosis. Approximately 45% of the total burden is attributed to food. T. gondii and Campylobacter spp. appear to be key targets for additional intervention efforts, with a focus on food and environmental pathways. The ranking of foodborne pathogens based on burden is very different compared to when only incidence is considered. The burden of acute disease is a relatively small part of the total burden. In the Netherlands, the burden of foodborne pathogens is similar to the burden of upper respiratory and urinary tract infections.

The estimated disease burden of norovirus in The Netherlands

“…The model was run for 10 000 iterations. The distribution functions of parameters that were used to estimate the disease burden of infection with norovirus are described elsewhere [15], and estimates based on new data are shown in Tables 3-5. The sensitivity of model outcomes in relation to uncertain input parameters were analysed using regression analyses using the Tornado Plot function in @RISK.…”

Community incidence of pathogen-specific gastroenteritis: reconstructing the surveillance pyramid for seven pathogens in seven European Union member states

“…Furthermore, the incidence estimates obtained with the pyramid reconstruction approach provide a better basis for burden-of-disease estimates, quantified in terms of disability-adjusted life years [7,37], and for estimating the public health benefits and cost-benefit ratios of interventions supported by active surveillance, aimed at reducing disease incidence. …”

“…In The Netherlands, based on the Sensor study in 1999, the multiplier for salmonellosis was estimated as 13 . 4 [6,7]. A recent study, based on disease risks in Swedish travellers estimated that for the European Union (EU) as a whole, the multiplier for salmonellosis was 58, but ranged between 0 .…”

Economics of zoonoses surveillance in a ‘One Health’ context: an assessment of Campylobacter surveillance in Switzerland

“…Calculated based on excess mortality risk for laboratory-confirmed cases (0.9). This multiplier was applied to age-specific mortality risk by all causes (Statistics Netherlands' data used as surrogate) [32,33] RA ** Calculated based on: -Probability of having RA for a GE patient visiting a GP (RiskBeta (46;565)), -Probability of a patient with RA seeking care for (RiskBeta (10;37)), -Probability of hospitalization for RA patients who visit a GP (RiskBeta (2;45)) [33] IBS µ Pert (7.2; 8.8; 10.4) [34] IBD # Calculated based on the age specific risk of IBD and the excess risk IBD [33] GBS^ Beta(60;29,942) Mortality: RiskPert (0.01;0.02;0.05) [35] Duration of illness (years) GE (diarrhea) Pert (0.007;0.02;00.9)…”