BackgroundSurvival estimates for individuals with Alzheimer’s disease (AD) are informative to understand the full disease trajectory, but precise estimates for atypical AD variants are scarce. Atypical AD variants are characterized by non-amnestic phenotypes, an early-onset and lower prevalence ofAPOEε4-carriership, which are all possible modulators of clinical trajectories. We aimed to provide survival estimates for posterior cortical atrophy (PCA; “visual-AD”), logopenic variant primary progressive aphasia (lvPPA; “language-AD”) and behavioral-AD (bvAD), and to evaluate the effect of phenotypical atypicality beyond known mortality-determinants.MethodsThis observational study included 2081 amyloid-positive patients (age 65±8 years) from the Amsterdam Dementia Cohort classified as typical AD (n=1801) or atypical AD (n=280; PCA [n=112], lvPPA [n=86], and bvAD [n=82]). Survival estimates from first-visit (∼time-of-diagnosis) to death/censoring (Central Public Administration) were determined (Kaplan-Meier analysis) and compared (Log-Rank tests) across diagnostic groups. To assess effects of atypical AD on mortality, cox proportional-hazard models were performed including age, sex, education, MMSE-score andAPOEε4-carriership (model-1), followed by adding the atypical AD group (model-2) or atypical AD variants individually (model-3), while using typical AD as reference. A likelihood ratio test was performed between model-1 and 2 to assess whether atypical AD improved the model-fit.ResultsThe estimated median survival time for atypical AD of 6.3 years (95%CI: [5.8-6.9]) was shorter than for typical AD (7.2[7.0-7.5], p=0.02). Median survival times across the atypical AD variants were consistently shorter (PCA: 6.3[5.5-7.3], p=0.055); lvPPA: 6.6[5.7-7.7], p=0.110; bvAD: 6.3[5.0-9.1], p=0.121, 48% deceased). In cox proportional-hazards model-1, male sex (HR=1.46[1.30-1.64], p<0.001), age (HR=1.02[1.01-1.03], p<0.001), and MMSE (HR=0.94[0.93-0.96], p<0.001) were associated with increased mortality risk.APOEε4heterozygosity was associated with reduced mortality risk compared to non-carriers (HR=0.85[0.74-0.97], p=0.015). In model-2, atypical AD improved the model fit (model 2; χ²=8.88, p=0.003) and was associated with 31% increased mortality risk compared to typical AD (HR=1.31[1.10-1.56], p=0.002). In model-3, contributions of the variants were: HRPCA=1.35[1.05-1.73], p=0.019; HRlvPPA=1.27[0.94-1.69], p=0.114; HRbvAD=1.31[0.94-1.83], p=0.105].ConclusionsSurvival in atypical AD was shorter compared to typical AD. Atypicality appears an important risk factor for mortality beyond age, sex, education,APOEε4-carriership and disease severity.Trial registration informationNA.