2021
DOI: 10.1016/j.eatbeh.2021.101548
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Diseases of affluence? A systematic review of the literature on socioeconomic diversity in eating disorders

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
39
0
1

Year Published

2021
2021
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 70 publications
(46 citation statements)
references
References 121 publications
1
39
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…For example, we would argue that socio-economic and educational diversity will become increasingly relevant in ED etiology and treatment. Although at present there are no clear links between diversity in terms of socio-economic background and the prevalence of EDs (21), level of education, and other factors associated with socioeconomic status have been linked to food insecurity during the Covid-19 pandemic (86). Food insecurity, in turn, has been repeatedly linked to ED pathology (87), suggesting that future ED populations may disproportionally stem from lower-income and lower-education households.…”
Section: Anticipating Diversity Challengesmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…For example, we would argue that socio-economic and educational diversity will become increasingly relevant in ED etiology and treatment. Although at present there are no clear links between diversity in terms of socio-economic background and the prevalence of EDs (21), level of education, and other factors associated with socioeconomic status have been linked to food insecurity during the Covid-19 pandemic (86). Food insecurity, in turn, has been repeatedly linked to ED pathology (87), suggesting that future ED populations may disproportionally stem from lower-income and lower-education households.…”
Section: Anticipating Diversity Challengesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In fact, recent years witnessed an unprecedented increase in ED incidence among men (11,12), older adults (13,14), gender and sexual minority individuals (15), underrepresented ethnic groups (16,17), and adults with intellectual disabilities (18)(19)(20). Although wealthier individuals are more likely to receive ED treatment (9), the existing data suggest that EDs present equally across different socio-economic backgrounds (21). The changing demographics of the ED population point to a critical role of diversity in ED etiology, broadly defined in terms of any social or individual identity features that lead to the perception of differences between people (22), with possible implications for ED presentation and assessment, and the necessity for adjustments according to diverse treatment needs.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This suggests that broadly speaking, FI is not routinely considered by patients or clinicians as a factor that impacts transdiagnostic ED treatment. Recent findings suggest that EDs are often seeing as diseases of affluence (Huryk, Drury, & Loeb, 2021), and thus, clinicians may not be in the mindset to assess for socioeconomic status and possibly resulting FI. Perhaps more importantly, these findings represent a call to action for clinicians; participants in this study reported feeling uncomfortable bringing up FI to their therapists, even when it was treatment interfering.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Our sample matched the demographic characteristics of the general population in age, sex, ethnicity and state of residence, but appears to be more highly educated than the general population. Although education does not appear to be associated to the prevalence of EDs (Huryk et al, 2021; Mitchison & Hay, 2014), some evidence suggests that higher education is associated with greater prevalence of positive ED screens levels (Yao et al, 2021). It is possible that the higher education level of our sample contributed to the high number of positive screens in our study.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%