“…This procedure consisted of: (1) recognition of thick, upraised, or otherwise teratological reaction rims along holes or margins; (2) demonstration of stereotyped feeding patterns or some other indication of insect herbivore behavior reflected in the type and location of foliar damage, (3) detailed examination of damaged margins of foliar elements, revealing small mandible marks, secondary vein stringers, or other anatomical evidence indicating extraction of foliar tissue by a mandibulate insect, and (4) patterns of host specificity, particularly if stereotyped damage patterns were associated with particular plant host taxa or even particular foliar regions of the same plant host taxon. Some plant damage was not attributable to insect herbivory, and was considered fungal in origin (Massée, 1910;Sinclair et al, 1987) or the result of postmortem degradation or premortem physical breakage consistent with the architectural designs of the foliar elements (Vincent, 1990). In this study, the term 'foliar element', equivalent to a specimen, referred to any photosynthetic organ, occurring as a digitizable unit surrounded by rock matrix, regardless of anatomical origin.…”