2016
DOI: 10.2737/rmrs-gtr-335
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Diseases of trees in the Great Plains

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
4
1

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 5 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 1 publication
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Trees experiencing stress are associated with a higher incidence of Cytospora spp. canker (Bergdahl & Hill, 2016), lowered plant defences, and higher nutrient contents more favourable to phytophagous insects (Flaherty et al, 2011; Mattson & Haack, 1987). As such, Cytospora spp.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Trees experiencing stress are associated with a higher incidence of Cytospora spp. canker (Bergdahl & Hill, 2016), lowered plant defences, and higher nutrient contents more favourable to phytophagous insects (Flaherty et al, 2011; Mattson & Haack, 1987). As such, Cytospora spp.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Symptoms of infection include reduction of shoot and radical growth, abnormal roots, formation of witches' brooms and chlorotic or deformed leaves (Figure 2X.a-d). More susceptible trees also show dieback symptoms, gradual decline and death (Sinclair and Griffiths 1994;Sinclair, Griffiths and Davis 1996;Bergdahl and Hill 2016). In order of vulnerability, F. americana L. and F. pennsylvanica Marsch are the most affected species in the USA, while F. velutina Torr.…”
Section: Ash Yellows Disease ('Candidatus Phytoplasma')mentioning
confidence: 99%