2009
DOI: 10.1103/physrevd.79.061702
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Disentangling forms of Lorentz violation with complementary clock comparison experiments

Abstract: Atomic clock comparisons provide some of the most precise tests of Lorentz and CPT symmetries in the laboratory. With data from multiple such experiments using different nuclei, it is possible to constrain new regions of the parameter space for Lorentz violation. Relativistic effects in the nuclei allow us to disentangle forms of Lorentz violation which could not be separately measured in purely nonrelativistic experiments. The disentangled bounds in the neutron sectors are at the 10 −28 GeV level, far better … Show more

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
9
0

Year Published

2012
2012
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
9
1

Relationship

2
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 22 publications
(9 citation statements)
references
References 46 publications
0
9
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The possibility that physics beyond the standard model might violate Lorentz invariance [1][2][3] has motivated experimental tests with high precision and broad scope. In particular, experiments have placed stringent limits on anisotropies in the laws of motion of the photon, electron, proton and neutron based on, e.g., electromagnetic cavities [4][5][6][7], clock comparisons [8][9][10][11][12][13], magnetometry [14][15][16][17][18], ultracold neutrons [19] and ion traps [20]. Some anisotropic inertial masses of particles are known to be below 10 −28 GeV [18], but others are more weakly constrained.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The possibility that physics beyond the standard model might violate Lorentz invariance [1][2][3] has motivated experimental tests with high precision and broad scope. In particular, experiments have placed stringent limits on anisotropies in the laws of motion of the photon, electron, proton and neutron based on, e.g., electromagnetic cavities [4][5][6][7], clock comparisons [8][9][10][11][12][13], magnetometry [14][15][16][17][18], ultracold neutrons [19] and ion traps [20]. Some anisotropic inertial masses of particles are known to be below 10 −28 GeV [18], but others are more weakly constrained.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The d coefficients are particularly interesting because unlike most of the other terms they are CPT even; they break Lorentz symmetry without violating CPT. Recently, efforts have been made to disentangle various LLI violating terms of the SME by comparing clock experiments performed on heavy and light nuclei [13]. As Hg and Cs both have heavy nuclei, the present results may also prove useful in these efforts.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 82%
“…Other past work has explored the influence of nucleons' motions inside large nuclei and how that motion affects precisely which LV coefficients are measurable in atomic clock experiments [30]. To the extent that the short-distance nucleon-nucleon potential responsible for nuclear binding is mediated by the exchange of multiple pions, the LV interaction Lagrangians described in this work may be used to understand how Lorentz violation would modify the shapes of the nucleon-nucleon potentials.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%