2021
DOI: 10.1007/jhep04(2021)158
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Disentangling QCD and new physics in D → πℓ+ℓ−

Abstract: In this paper we consider the decay D+ → π+ℓ+ℓ−, addressing in particular the resonance contributions as well as the relatively large contributions from the weak annihilation diagrams. For the weak annihilation diagrams we include known results from QCD factorisation at low q2 and at high q2, adapting the existing calculation for B decays in the Operator Product Expansion. The hadronic resonance contributions are obtained through a dispersion relation, modelling the spectral functions as towers of Regge-like r… Show more

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1

Citation Types

0
4
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5
3

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 13 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 63 publications
(159 reference statements)
0
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…As in semileptonic rare b-decays, a dispersion relation plus e + e − → hadrons-data [21] can provide an alternative resonance parameterization to (2.4). It also invokes factorization and fudge factors a M , however, avoids double-counting by extracting the sum of long-and short-distance contributions experimentally, see also [22] and [23] for application to D → ρ and D → π decays, respectively. Since in charm, unlike in beauty, C R 9 dominates over the SM short-distance contribution, see figure 9, and the parameterizations yield similar distributions in D-decays within their sizable, notably, phase-induced uncertainties [8,23], we employ the significantly simpler ansatz (2.5) for null test analyses in charmed baryons.…”
Section: Resonance Contributionsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…As in semileptonic rare b-decays, a dispersion relation plus e + e − → hadrons-data [21] can provide an alternative resonance parameterization to (2.4). It also invokes factorization and fudge factors a M , however, avoids double-counting by extracting the sum of long-and short-distance contributions experimentally, see also [22] and [23] for application to D → ρ and D → π decays, respectively. Since in charm, unlike in beauty, C R 9 dominates over the SM short-distance contribution, see figure 9, and the parameterizations yield similar distributions in D-decays within their sizable, notably, phase-induced uncertainties [8,23], we employ the significantly simpler ansatz (2.5) for null test analyses in charmed baryons.…”
Section: Resonance Contributionsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Refs. [9,10], where the hadronic resonance contributions are obtained through a dispersion relation, modeling the spectral functions as towers of Regge-like resonance in each channel and imposing the partonic behavior in the deep Euclidean.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The experimental and theoretical status of rare charm decays is presented in Ref. [5] and increasing and ongoing research interest [1,2,[5][6][7][8][9][10][11][12][13][14][15][16][17][18][19][20][21][22][23] manifests the importance of progress in the field.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%