The ergodicity breaking parameter is a measure for the heterogeneity among different trajectories of one ensemble. In this report this parameter is calculated for fractional Brownian motion with a random change of time scale, often called "subordination". We proceed to show that this quantity is the same as the known CTRW case.PACS numbers: 05.40.Fb,05.40.Fb "Weak ergodicity breaking" is a term which occurred in the spotlight a few years ago, see for instance [1][2][3][4][5][6] with respect to observables showing aging behavior. The term "aging" applies to the specific behavior pertinent to the values of an observable measured at two distinct instants of time, like the mean squared displacement (MSD) in the time interval between t 1 and t 2 , ∆X 2 (t 1 , t 2 ) as depending on the age t 1 of the system (assumed to be prepared at t = 0) at the beginning of observation. Aging here essentially refers to a non-stationarity of the observed process, in which ∆X 2 (t 1 , t 2 ) cannot be expressed via the time lag τ = t 2 − t 1 only and keeps a considerable dependence on t 1 as a stand-alone variable.Let us concentrate now on the ergodicity properties the squared displacement during the time interval τ in a measurement starting at t. In the case when the data acquisition in each single run of the process takes time from t = 0 to t = T , the time average of ∆X 2 (t, t + τ ) can be performed:The process is considered ergodic provided ∆X 2 (τ ) = ∆X 2 (t, t + τ ) . The discussion of the ergodicity implies that the corresponding limit does exist in some probabilistic sense (say, in probability) and is equal to the ensemble mean. Note that the time-average over the data acquisition interval removes the explicit t-dependence. For non-stationary processes the ensemble mean at any t depends on t, while the time-integration over the data acquisition interval removes this dependence. Therefore, even provided the integral above converges in a whatever sense, it cannot converge to all ∆X 2 (t, t + τ ) simultaneously, and our process is trivially non-ergodic.Whether the random process is stationary or not, one can ask how diverse are its different realizations, i.e. how different are two trajectories of the process with respect to some time-averaged observable O(τ ; t) (in our case the MSD, O(τ ; t) = ∆X 2 (t, t + τ )). To this purpose one considers a fixed-T approximation to eq.(1)At any finite T the value of O(τ ) T is a random variable. For both, stationary and non-stationary processes O(τ, t), one can consider a parameter describing the strength of fluctuations of O(τ ) T . As a measure of homogeneity or heterogeneity of different trajectories one can take the relative dispersion of the O(τ ) T in different realizations of the process:The parameter J (often called "ergodicity breaking parameter") shows how different are different trajectories of the process with respect to the observable O. For stationary processes, vanishing of J in the long time limit indeed implies ergodicity [7], and its non-vanishing witnesses against erg...