1998
DOI: 10.2307/2410927
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Disentangling the Effects of Mating Propensity and Mating Choice in Drosophila

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
19
0

Year Published

2000
2000
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 27 publications
(19 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
0
19
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Our mate choice protocol avoided some of the potential confounds that have been noted in related systems (e.g. see Arnold et al ., 1996; Casares et al ., 1998). First, we avoided the potential depletion of males from the mating pool (see Casares et al ., 1998).…”
Section: Phase I: Establishment Of Populationsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Our mate choice protocol avoided some of the potential confounds that have been noted in related systems (e.g. see Arnold et al ., 1996; Casares et al ., 1998). First, we avoided the potential depletion of males from the mating pool (see Casares et al ., 1998).…”
Section: Phase I: Establishment Of Populationsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The copulating pairs were aspirated out of the cage for identification by the food coloring in the guts. We let the mating trials run for 1 hour or until 60 matings (50% of possible copulations) had occurred, whichever came first (as recommended by [56] to avoid bias). Several comparisons were replicated at least three times to determine overall reliability in the mating behavior.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…We conducted tests until we had collected data for about 100 pairs per comparison, or at least five tests per comparison. By scoring only 20 pairs in each group of 160 flies, we hoped to keep the sampling variances approximately the same during the test, so that all individuals had a high probability of encountering flies of the other genotype (Casares et al ., 1998 recommend that no more than the first 50% of mating pairs be scored, so our methods were conservative). Each fly was tested just once.…”
Section: Tests Of Behavioural Isolationmentioning
confidence: 99%