2020
DOI: 10.1002/essoar.10503228.1
|View full text |Cite
Preprint
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Disentangling the impact of catchment heterogeneity on nitrate export dynamics from event to long-term time scales

Abstract: High nitrate concentrations in ground water and surface water are a well-known but still widespread problem in most developed countries (Bouraoui & Grizzetti, 2011;Kohl et al., 1971; Rockström et al., 2009). These high concentrations pose a threat to our drinking water quality and the integrity of aquatic ecosystems

Help me understand this report
View published versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
2

Citation Types

5
23
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
5
1

Relationship

3
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 11 publications
(28 citation statements)
references
References 48 publications
5
23
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The simulated yearly average N surplus (nitrate input + mineralization ‐ plant uptake) from the optimal parameter set is 33.8 kg N ha ‒1 year ‒1 . This is comparable with the calculated N surplus (33 kg N hav ‒1 year ‒1 ) from other studies for the area (Häußermann et al., 2019; Winter et al., 2021). In terms of storage, the mobile N storage (DIN) in the soil and groundwater is around 22.3 kg N ha ‒1 and 4.6 kg N ha ‒1 , respectively.…”
Section: Results and Validationsupporting
confidence: 90%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…The simulated yearly average N surplus (nitrate input + mineralization ‐ plant uptake) from the optimal parameter set is 33.8 kg N ha ‒1 year ‒1 . This is comparable with the calculated N surplus (33 kg N hav ‒1 year ‒1 ) from other studies for the area (Häußermann et al., 2019; Winter et al., 2021). In terms of storage, the mobile N storage (DIN) in the soil and groundwater is around 22.3 kg N ha ‒1 and 4.6 kg N ha ‒1 , respectively.…”
Section: Results and Validationsupporting
confidence: 90%
“…(2021) for the same area also shows an immediate decrease of instream nitrate concentration and loading following a drastic decrease of N input after 1990. In the lower Selke catchment, longer time lags (up to 12 years) were estimated due to drier conditions and deeper aquifers (Winter et al., 2021). This indicates a high variability of N‐related time lags in the region.…”
Section: Results and Validationmentioning
confidence: 73%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Three nested sub-catchments for the Selke as well as the Holtemme river system, both part of the Bode, a well-studied river system near the Harz Mountains in central Germany were included additionally (Fig. 1) (Ehrhardt et al, 2019;Rode et al, 2016;Winter et al, 2020;Mueller et al, 2018). All catchments had ~10 years of uninterrupted daily Q data available between 1995 and 2010 (Musolff, 2020).…”
Section: Catchment Selectionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…To verify the model's ability to reproduce realistic concentration time series and Curvature, modeled and simulated data were compared in the Selke catchment (at Meisdorf gauging station; 282 km², Table 2) where extensive field campaigns and modelling studies have been conducted related to in-stream processes (Rode et al, 2016;Dupas et al, 2017;Yang et al, 2019;Yang et al, 2018). This relatively homogeneous upstream part of the Selke consists of forest and cropland and is characterized by consistent export regimes (Winter et al, 2020). For an input parameter combination (Table C1) set to reasonable values for this catchment (Rode et al, 2016), the land to stream NO 3 − inputs averaged 1.2 kg N day -1 km -2 which is similar to the 1.9 kg N day -1 km -2 reported by Winter et al (2020) for the Selke River (Meisdorf ); and it is well within the general 0.001 to 100 kg N day -1 km -2 range established by Mulholland et al (2008).…”
Section: Catchment Selectionmentioning
confidence: 99%