2019
DOI: 10.1002/aqc.3023
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Disentangling the trophic interactions between American bullfrogs and native anurans: Complications resulting from post‐metamorphic ontogenetic niche shifts

Abstract: 1. The American bullfrog, Lithobates catesbeianus (Shaw, 1802), is considered one of the world's worst invaders because of its potential to affect native fauna adversely, especially amphibians, through predation, competition, breeding interference, and disease transmission.2. Here, the potential impact of introduced American bullfrogs (juveniles and adults) on native adult green frogs, Pelophylax kl. esculentus (Linnaeus, 1758), was investigated in a pond ecosystem by means of stomach-content and stable-isotop… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
2

Citation Types

1
22
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

1
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 19 publications
(23 citation statements)
references
References 78 publications
(210 reference statements)
1
22
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The introduction of a non‐native predator ( L. catesbeianus ) at the second highest level of the study food web, linked by a predator–prey relationship to non‐native P. clarkii , could have a marginal role in affecting the structure of the whole community, potentially because of the primacy of L. catesbeianus – P. clarkii interactions (Bissattini & Vignoli, 2017; Bissattini, Buono & Vignoli, 2018; Bissattini, Buono & Vignoli, 2019). In this context, unpredictable and unwanted outcomes following IAS removal in isolation are likely to occur since invaders are well established, strongly interspersed with native species, and connected at different trophic levels ( Zavaleta, Hobbs & Mooney, 2001; Schlaepfer et al, 2005).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…The introduction of a non‐native predator ( L. catesbeianus ) at the second highest level of the study food web, linked by a predator–prey relationship to non‐native P. clarkii , could have a marginal role in affecting the structure of the whole community, potentially because of the primacy of L. catesbeianus – P. clarkii interactions (Bissattini & Vignoli, 2017; Bissattini, Buono & Vignoli, 2018; Bissattini, Buono & Vignoli, 2019). In this context, unpredictable and unwanted outcomes following IAS removal in isolation are likely to occur since invaders are well established, strongly interspersed with native species, and connected at different trophic levels ( Zavaleta, Hobbs & Mooney, 2001; Schlaepfer et al, 2005).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, most often, the combined effects of non‐native predators on native prey species are lower than the expected sum of individual effects owing to antagonistic interactions among IAS (Jackson, 2015; Wasserman et al, 2016; Bissattini & Vignoli, 2017; Jackson et al, 2017; Bissattini, Buono & Vignoli, 2018; Bissattini, Buono & Vignoli, 2019). Indeed, there are several cases in which non‐native prey represents an alternative food source for non‐native predators, decreasing the predation pressure on native resources (Karl & Best, 1982; Murphy & Bradfield, 1992; Liu et al, 2015; Bissattini, Buono & Vignoli, 2018; Liu et al, 2018; Bissattini, Buono & Vignoli, 2019). This suggests that invaders in different trophic positions may replace the ecological role of extinct taxa, mitigating the trophic downgrading (Cucherousset, Blanchet & Olden, 2012).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…It is possible that our native amphibian assemblage was not as susceptible to bullfrogs due to their use of terrestrial habitats post-metamorphosis. Where native amphibian species are more reliant on aquatic habitats, such as in desert or Mediterranean climates, they may be more vulnerable to bullfrog predation or competition (Bissattini et al 2019). Bullfrogs may also be more problematic where they transmit deadly amphibian pathogens, which pose a serious threat for native amphibians in Brazil and Europe (Garner et al 2006, Carvalho et al 2017.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The feeding behavior of frog species in the wild includes insects and arthropods, having specialized diet on selection of prey with species restricted in forests and man-altered environments (Braga et al 2012). Comparison of diet in invasive and native populations is necessary to understand dietary requirements, dietary flexibility, and the associated impacts of invasive species (Courant et al 2017;Bissattini and Vignoli 2017;Bissattini et al 2018Bissattini et al , 2019.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%