2006
DOI: 10.1016/j.jfludis.2006.04.002
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Disfluency data of German preschool children who stutter and comparison children

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

7
25
3
6

Year Published

2011
2011
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
7
3

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 30 publications
(41 citation statements)
references
References 11 publications
7
25
3
6
Order By: Relevance
“…There is also a higher incidence of repetition events in the SG, both of typical disfluencies (up to two repetitions of words) and of atypical disfluencies (more than three repetitions of words, syllables and sounds) as well as atypical disfluencies of block and prolongation types, both in spontaneous speech and in oral reading. Such data confirm those found in the literature (26,27) . Repetitions can be caused by a failure in the temporization of the processes involved in the speech and it is possible that they reflect in the selection of paradigmatic and syntagmatic axes, causing difficulty in the selection of the next term and preventing the linearity of the process (25) .…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 92%
“…There is also a higher incidence of repetition events in the SG, both of typical disfluencies (up to two repetitions of words) and of atypical disfluencies (more than three repetitions of words, syllables and sounds) as well as atypical disfluencies of block and prolongation types, both in spontaneous speech and in oral reading. Such data confirm those found in the literature (26,27) . Repetitions can be caused by a failure in the temporization of the processes involved in the speech and it is possible that they reflect in the selection of paradigmatic and syntagmatic axes, causing difficulty in the selection of the next term and preventing the linearity of the process (25) .…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 92%
“…Other disfluencies were not described. Finally, during the same interactional situation, Natke et al (2006) observed a mean of 3.75 total disfluencies per 100 syllables with 2.59 NSD and 1.16 SLD in German-speaking children aged five or younger. Table 1 shows the means and standard deviations for the percentages of NSD, SLD, and total disfluencies for these studies.…”
mentioning
confidence: 71%
“…A number of studies have been completed examining disfluencies and stuttering in monolingual and /or bilingual speakers who speak languages other than English, including German (e.g., Dworzynski, Howell, Au-Yeung, & Rommel, 2004;Dworzynski, Howell, & Natke, 2003;Natke, Sandrieser, Pietrowsky, & Kalveram, 2006), Dutch (e.g., Boey et al, 2007), Mandarin (e.g., Lim, Lincoln, Chan, & Onslow, 2008), Ga (Kirk, 1977), Igbo (Nwokah, 1988), Maltese (Agius, 1995), and Portuguese (e.g., Juste & de Andrade, 2006). Reports describing stuttering in Spanish speakers, on the other hand, remain relatively few-particularly in light of the growing number of Spanish speakers in the United States (U.S. Bureau of the Census, 2008).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%