2010
DOI: 10.1142/s0218001410008275
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

DISGUISED DISCRIMINATION OF LOCALITY-BASED UNSUPERVISED DIMENSIONALITY REDUCTION

Abstract: Many locality-based unsupervised dimensionality reduction (DR) algorithms have recently been proposed and demonstrated to be e®ective to a certain degree in some classi¯cation tasks. In this paper, we aim to show that: (1) a discriminant disposal is intentionally or unintentionally induced from the construction of locality in these unsupervised algorithms, however, such a discrimination is often inconsistent with the actual class information, so here called disguised discrimination; (2) sensitivities of these … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2012
2012
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
5

Relationship

1
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 5 publications
(1 citation statement)
references
References 22 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Up to date, to our knowledge, there are few particular concerns on these issues. So, pursuing our previous studies on the graph construction and DA [19][20][21], in this paper, we elaborately address the issues involved above. Concretely, firstly, we illustrate the meanings of local compactness, global compactness, local margin, and global margin in DA, as shown in Figure 1; secondly, we formulate globally constructed intraclass and interclass graphs; thirdly, resorting to the relation between the scatter and the structure preservation property of DA based on graph construction, by Proposition 1 and Corollary 2 and Proposition 3 and Corollary 4, we demonstrate that the interclass graph should be globally constructed and the intraclass graph should be locally constructed; finally, by jointly utilizing both the globality and the locality, we develop two DA algorithms; that is, one is Globally marginal and Locally compact Discriminant Analysis (GmLcDA) algorithm based on so-introduced global interclass and local intraclass graphs, and the other is Locally marginal and Globally compact Discriminant Analysis (LmGcDA) based on so-introduced local interclass and global intraclass graphs.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Up to date, to our knowledge, there are few particular concerns on these issues. So, pursuing our previous studies on the graph construction and DA [19][20][21], in this paper, we elaborately address the issues involved above. Concretely, firstly, we illustrate the meanings of local compactness, global compactness, local margin, and global margin in DA, as shown in Figure 1; secondly, we formulate globally constructed intraclass and interclass graphs; thirdly, resorting to the relation between the scatter and the structure preservation property of DA based on graph construction, by Proposition 1 and Corollary 2 and Proposition 3 and Corollary 4, we demonstrate that the interclass graph should be globally constructed and the intraclass graph should be locally constructed; finally, by jointly utilizing both the globality and the locality, we develop two DA algorithms; that is, one is Globally marginal and Locally compact Discriminant Analysis (GmLcDA) algorithm based on so-introduced global interclass and local intraclass graphs, and the other is Locally marginal and Globally compact Discriminant Analysis (LmGcDA) based on so-introduced local interclass and global intraclass graphs.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%