Dishabituation produces interactions during multiple schedules

Reinforcers lose their effectiveness when they are presented repeatedly. Early researchers labeled this loss of effectiveness as satiation without conducting an experimental analysis. When such an analysis is conducted, habituation provides a more precise and empirically accurate label for the changes in reinforcer effectiveness. This paper reviews some of the data that suggest that habituation occurs to repeatedly presented reinforcers. It also argues that habituation has surprisingly different implications than satiation for theory and practice in behavior analysis. For example, postulating that habituation occurs to repeatedly presented reinforcers suggests ways for maintaining the strength of an existing reinforcer and for weakening the strength of a problematic reinforcer that differ from those implied by an account in terms of satiation. An habituation account may also lead to different ways of conceptualizing the regulation of behavior. For example, habituation may be a singleprocess contributor to the termination of behaviors that are usually attributed to satiation (e.g., ingestive behaviors such as eating and drinking), fatigue (e.g., energetic behaviors such as running), the waning of attention (e.g., cognitive behaviors such as studying), and pharmacodynamic factors (e.g., drug taking).

show abstract

Dishabituation produces interactions during multiple schedules

Cited by 2 publications

References 36 publications

Characteristics, Theories, and Implications of Dynamic Changes in Reinforcer Effectiveness

Characteristics, Theories, and Implications of Dynamic Changes in Reinforcer Effectiveness

Dynamic changes in reinforcer effectiveness: Satiation and habituation have different implications for theory and practice

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About