2012
DOI: 10.1016/j.watres.2012.05.034
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Disinfection by-products in ballast water treatment: An evaluation of regulatory data

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
5

Citation Types

2
52
0

Year Published

2013
2013
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 108 publications
(54 citation statements)
references
References 38 publications
2
52
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Commonly used disinfectants for water treatment include ultraviolet (UV) irradiation frequently used in large water and wastewater treatment plants which directly impairs the intracellular functions of microbial cells leading to growth inhibition and death [6]. UV irradiation does not produce disinfectant by-products [7], it is cost-intensive and requires large amounts of energy and frequent maintenance, including replacement of the UV lamps [8,9].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Commonly used disinfectants for water treatment include ultraviolet (UV) irradiation frequently used in large water and wastewater treatment plants which directly impairs the intracellular functions of microbial cells leading to growth inhibition and death [6]. UV irradiation does not produce disinfectant by-products [7], it is cost-intensive and requires large amounts of energy and frequent maintenance, including replacement of the UV lamps [8,9].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It also, requires special operation, and potentially forms bromate as a by-product in waters containing bromide [9,10]. Chlorine is a potent oxidant which causes the destruction of nucleic acids and cell membranes and it is an attractive option for disinfection due to its ease of handling, low capital cost and production of residual chlorine [11,12].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…UV light is known to impair DNA and cellular structures, thus compromising the viability of treated organisms (Holzinger and Lütz 2006). Advantages of UV and its derivatives treatments such as advanced oxidation processes (Wu et al 2011;Rubio et al 2013a, b) include the absence of chemicals and low formation of disinfection by-products (Jorquera et al 2002;Mamlook et al 2008;Werschkun et al 2012;Fisher et al 2014;Zhang et al 2014;Gonsior et al 2015). On the other hand, the inactivating effect of UV is limited by the lack of residual effect and the existence of cellular mechanisms to minimize the damage caused by the treatment, primarily based on DNA photorepair under photosynthetically active radiation (Fafanđel et al 2002;Oliveri et al 2014;Poepping et al 2014).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, there is a lack of information about the causes and mechanisms of DBP formation, and the effects of different DBPs to the marine aquatic environment. These deficiencies have also been pointed out by Werschkun et al (2012). Previous work do not address the effect of concentration and nature of organic precursors on DBP formation potential, and do not compare observed toxicological effects to concentration levels of DBPs in an attempt to explain causes of toxicity.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%