2019
DOI: 10.1016/j.watres.2019.05.024
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Disinfection byproduct formation during drinking water treatment and distribution: A review of unintended effects of engineering agents and materials

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
46
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5
4

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 165 publications
(46 citation statements)
references
References 174 publications
(257 reference statements)
0
46
0
Order By: Relevance
“…This indicates changes in the balance between Cl-DBPs and Br-DBPs during distribution to consumers, potentially explained by the different stabilities of Cl-DBPs and Br-DBPs, where Br-DBPs are less stable. 27,34,35 Debromination by hydrolytic reaction is faster than dechlorination as the Br-C bond is longer and its dissociation energy lower, 36,37 i.e., the C-Br bond is weaker. The degradation rate increases under alkaline conditions (Fig.…”
Section: The Fate Of Br-dbpsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…This indicates changes in the balance between Cl-DBPs and Br-DBPs during distribution to consumers, potentially explained by the different stabilities of Cl-DBPs and Br-DBPs, where Br-DBPs are less stable. 27,34,35 Debromination by hydrolytic reaction is faster than dechlorination as the Br-C bond is longer and its dissociation energy lower, 36,37 i.e., the C-Br bond is weaker. The degradation rate increases under alkaline conditions (Fig.…”
Section: The Fate Of Br-dbpsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…At STO, the proportion of DBPs containing two chlorine atoms decreased from ∼18% after disinfection to <1% at the tap, possibly connected to differences in dehalogenation rates depending on the number of halogen substituents. 36 DBPs solely detected in tap waters probably formed after longer contact times and were characterized by lower average O/C ratios (LIN and STO) and higher average mass (all DWTPs) (Table S7, † right column) and are listed in Table S9. † At MAL, the DBPs detected at the tap were substantially different from those detected at the DWTP (Fig.…”
Section: Characterization Of Tap Water Dbpsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In addition, the removal of DOM generally promotes the formation of brominated compounds favouring the reaction of chlorine with Brinstead of DOM. This could induce a greater toxicity, despite an overall decrease of DBP concentrations [82][83][84][85][86]. There is currently no economically feasible method to remove the halogens precursors of DBP, bromide and iodide.…”
Section: Mitigation Of Brominated and Iodinated Dbps Different Mitigation Strategies Have Been Proposed In Recent Years To Mitigate The Fmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Disinfectants used in premises have a different focus and mechanism of action on microbial cells (Jiang et al, 2018;Maertens et al, 2018;Paliy et al, 2018;Zazharskyi et al, 2020). Currently, preparations of ammonium compounds and colloidal silver are widely used for disinfection (Park et al, 2009;Ding et al, 2019;Diaz et al, 2019). Although the antibacterial properties of silver have been known for many centuries, the exact mechanism of this action remains the subject of discussion.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%