2019
DOI: 10.1016/j.bsheal.2019.02.006
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Disinfection efficiency of positive pressure respiratory protective hood using fumigation sterilization cabinet

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
9
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 10 publications
(9 citation statements)
references
References 20 publications
0
9
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Previous studies on VHP have primarily focused on efficiency of disinfection of respiratory protection, i.e. masks and face respirators [17,[22][23][24][25]. Our study, on the other hand, have focused on the effect of VHP treatment on a range of PPE including the full body suits/coveralls, face shields, and various layers of N-95 masks including the inner melt blown layer to study fiber integrity and texture using SEM.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Previous studies on VHP have primarily focused on efficiency of disinfection of respiratory protection, i.e. masks and face respirators [17,[22][23][24][25]. Our study, on the other hand, have focused on the effect of VHP treatment on a range of PPE including the full body suits/coveralls, face shields, and various layers of N-95 masks including the inner melt blown layer to study fiber integrity and texture using SEM.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Importantly, metal ions such as Ag + not only stabilize highly labile H 2 O 2 but also have been shown to synergize the antimicrobial effect of H 2 O 2 [20,21]. Indeed, several studies have demonstrated the utility of hydrogen peroxide vapors in disinfection of masks and face respirators [17,[22][23][24][25]. Nonetheless for PPE disinfection and reuse during pandemics, the method should be robust, have built-in controls for quality assurance and also be optimized to ensure compatibility with a range of PPE (bodysuits, masks and face-shields etc.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Although the N95 FFR is one of the most commonly used respiratory form of PPE by healthcare workers, powered air purifying respirators (PAPRs) such as positive pressure respiratory protective hoods (PPRPHs) may be used as well, especially during the high-risk procedures such as intubating a sick patient. It is important to state that “UVC, autoclave, and dry heating sterilization are not suitable for PPRPHs” [ 54 ]. This is due to the difference in materials between N95 respirators and the thermoplastic urethane or polyvinyl chloride material in PPRPHs.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, similarly to N95 FFR decontamination, VHP may be used. When the injection time was > 15 min, and the consumption of hydrogen peroxide was > 60 g, complete sterilization of Geobacillus stearothermophilus ATCC7953 on PPRPHs could be achieved [ 54 ]. Either 15 min injection time with 4 g/min injection rate, or a 60 min injection time with a 1 g/min injection rate were effective at decontaminating PPRPHs using VHP.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Hydrogen peroxide vapour decontamination technique, which is normally used to fumigate hospital rooms can be scaled to permit simultaneous sterilization. After 5 cycles applying Clarus C system® (Bioquell, Horsham, PA), the respirators appeared similar to new with no deformity 190,191 . After 10 cycles applying 7% H2O2 solution via the Pathogo Curis® (Curis) a complete decontamination of multiple virus…”
Section: Hydrogen Peroxide (H2o2)mentioning
confidence: 99%