Disinformation and misinformation triangle

Abstract

Purpose The purpose of this paper is to treat disinformation and misinformation (intentionally deceptive and unintentionally inaccurate misleading information, respectively) as a socio-cultural technology-enabled epidemic in digital news, propagated via social media. Design/methodology/approach The proposed disinformation and misinformation triangle is a conceptual model that identifies the three minimal causal factors occurring simultaneously to facilitate the spread of the epidemic at the societal level. Findings Following the epidemiological disease triangle model, the three interacting causal factors are translated into the digital news context: the virulent pathogens are falsifications, clickbait, satirical “fakes” and other deceptive or misleading news content; the susceptible hosts are information-overloaded, time-pressed news readers lacking media literacy skills; and the conducive environments are polluted poorly regulated social media platforms that propagate and encourage the spread of various “fakes.” Originality/value The three types of interventions – automation, education and regulation – are proposed as a set of holistic measures to reveal, and potentially control, predict and prevent further proliferation of the epidemic. Partial automated solutions with natural language processing, machine learning and various automated detection techniques are currently available, as exemplified here briefly. Automated solutions assist (but not replace) human judgments about whether news is truthful and credible. Information literacy efforts require further in-depth understanding of the phenomenon and interdisciplinary collaboration outside of the traditional library and information science, incorporating media studies, journalism, interpersonal psychology and communication perspectives.

COVID-19 and Infodemics: How to Solve this Problem

“…Disinformation is the deliberate creation and dissemination of false information (Bakir, McStay, 2018), while the term misinformation is the practice of those who disseminate it, without being aware of it. The difference between misinformation and disinformation would be intentionality, and both behaviours are very possible in today's society due to new technologies (Rubin, 2019). Social networks and online communication would be mainly responsible for the dissemination of fake news (Blanco-Herrero, Arcila-Calderón, 2019).…”

Emotional Performance of a Low-Cost Eco-Friendly PBL Methodology for Science Education. Approach in Prospective Teachers

“…When designing a good PBL, these emotional considerations have to be taken into account, so the entire didactic proposal is not only a matter of cognitive learning, but also an emotional and behavioral changing learning 1 .…”

“…The concern that inspires us to carry out this research is the conviction of the need for educate a scientifically competent citizen, who is able of making decision and adapting to an irremediably scientific-technological world in an environmental crisis. We live in a context of over-information, where we have in the precise instant all information we want, but also disinformation and misinformation [1]. Scientific knowledge helps us to position ourselves in the world with a critical eye.…”

Assessing News Credibility: Misinformation Content Indicators

“…In addition, misinformation is often more viral and generally spreads faster than credible information, namely because of its engaging narrative [16,20]. Furthermore, users are usually time-pressed news readers lacking media literacy skills, becoming "susceptible hosts" to misinformation [18].…”