2022
DOI: 10.5210/fm.v27i5.12533
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Disinformation networks: A quali-quantitative investigation of antagonistic Dutch-speaking Telegram channels

Abstract: In the field of disinformation research, the study of antagonistic networks and discourse on the messaging platform Telegram has developed into an active area of investigation. To this end, recent literature has specifically set out to map the scale, scope, and narrative trends marking Telegram communities with ties to localised, European contexts. The present paper contributes to this line of inquiry by offering an empirically-informed exploration of far-right and conspiracist Telegram channels associated wit… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
13
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
4
3
1
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 11 publications
(13 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
0
13
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Telegram's lax moderation policies, privacy (especially its 'secret chat' option), and capacity for large public groups makes it a go-to communication app for far-right extremists, conspiracy theorists, criminals, and extremists (including the Islamic State); consequently, issues such as misinformation, propaganda, conspiracy theories, radicalization, and hate speech are widespread on Telegram. Several researchers have analyzed Telegram data from the perspective of these groups and these issues (Herasimenka, et al, 2023;Willaert, et al, 2022;Krona, 2020;Rogers, 2020). However, all these features of Telegram also benefit citizens during times of dissent (protest movements), conflicts, and wars.…”
Section: Literature Reviewmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Telegram's lax moderation policies, privacy (especially its 'secret chat' option), and capacity for large public groups makes it a go-to communication app for far-right extremists, conspiracy theorists, criminals, and extremists (including the Islamic State); consequently, issues such as misinformation, propaganda, conspiracy theories, radicalization, and hate speech are widespread on Telegram. Several researchers have analyzed Telegram data from the perspective of these groups and these issues (Herasimenka, et al, 2023;Willaert, et al, 2022;Krona, 2020;Rogers, 2020). However, all these features of Telegram also benefit citizens during times of dissent (protest movements), conflicts, and wars.…”
Section: Literature Reviewmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Analyses of far-right groups on Telegram have revealed that they tend to operate in decentralized networks that are largely divided by ideology and nationality (Urman and Katz, 2020). However, Willaert et al, (2022) have shown that common antagonistic narratives still persist throughout diverse channels. This paper will map discourse communities created by Russian extremists on Telegram.…”
Section: Mapping Extremist Discourse Communities On Telegrammentioning
confidence: 99%
“…These studies often leverage both discourse and network analysis in mapping online discourse communities (Willaert et al, 2022;Krutrök and Lindgren 2018;Klein and Muis 2018;Himelboim et al, 2013). The discourse analysis is typically done through manual content analysis (Krutrök and Lindgren 2018; Klein and Muis 2018;Himelboim et al, 2013).…”
Section: Literature Reviewmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Consequently, issues such as misinformation, propaganda, conspiracy theories, radicalization, and hate speech are rampant on Telegram. Several researchers have analyzed Telegram data from the perspective of these groups and these issues (Herasimenka, Bright, Knuutila, & Howard, 2022;Krona, 2020;Rogers, 2020;Urman & Katz, 2022;Willaert, Peeters, Seijbel, & Van Raemdonck, 2022). However, all these features of Telegram also works to the benefit of citizens during the times of dissent (protest movements), conflicts, and wars.…”
Section: Literature Reviewmentioning
confidence: 99%