Diskurse zum Schwangerschaftsabbruch nach 1945

Hahn, Daphne

doi:10.1515/transcript.9783839426029.41

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...

Rechtsgeschichtliche Entwicklungen Bis 19901

Abortion In Germany1

Citation Types

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Unclassified

Year Published

2021

2023

Publication Types

Select...

Article2

Relationship

Self Cite0

Independent2

Authors

Journals

Cited by 2 publications

(2 citation statements)

References 0 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Unclassified

Order By: Relevance

“…[20,21]. In der DDR hingegen galt ab 1972 eine Fristenregelung, bei der die Frau innerhalb der ersten 3 Schwangerschaftsmonate faktisch ein Recht auf Abtreibung hatte [22].…”

Section: Rechtsgeschichtliche Entwicklungen Bis 1990unclassified

Der Schwangerschaftsabbruch in Deutschland – eine Zusammenfassung nach über 25 Jahren der Anwendung des 1995 reformierten § 218 StGB

Dienerowitz¹,

Bauer²

2023

Geburtshilfe Frauenheilkd

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

“…[20,21]. In der DDR hingegen galt ab 1972 eine Fristenregelung, bei der die Frau innerhalb der ersten 3 Schwangerschaftsmonate faktisch ein Recht auf Abtreibung hatte [22].…”

Section: Rechtsgeschichtliche Entwicklungen Bis 1990unclassified

Der Schwangerschaftsabbruch in Deutschland – eine Zusammenfassung nach über 25 Jahren der Anwendung des 1995 reformierten § 218 StGB

Dienerowitz¹,

Bauer²

2023

Geburtshilfe Frauenheilkd

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

“…Before then, access to abortion was a major point of contention. There has been a fair amount of discourse analysis done on West German debates on abortion: Hahn (2014) provides a general overview, Ferree (2003) provides a detailed comparison between German and US discourse, and Tichenor (2014) gives an account of the debate among Catholics. Wuerth (1999) provides an analysis of how East and West German feminist activists talked about abortion around the development of the reformed law, post-reunification.…”

Section: Abortion In Germanymentioning

confidence: 99%

Who can talk about abortion? Information, offence, freedom of speech, and the advertising ban in Germany

Ulbricht

2021

Politics

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

This article examines the debate in Germany on Article 219a of the criminal law, which prohibits doctors from advertising for abortions. This ban prevents advertising for abortions on the grounds that it would be offensive, while defining ‘advertising’ so broadly that it prevents doctors from publicly providing any information about abortions. The article offers an overview of the law, as well as the controversy following the conviction of General Practitioner Kristina Hänel, which led to a reform of the law. The curtailment of the provision of factual information by medical professionals is contrasted with the freedom of speech protection given to highly offensive speech acts by anti-abortion activists. The argument is made that there is a Christian perfectionism at the heart of the law on abortion in Germany that is shared by anti-abortion activists, leading to a situation that facilitates the mobilisation of anti-abortion sentiment while curtailing the freedom of speech of doctors.

show abstract

Diskurse zum Schwangerschaftsabbruch nach 1945

Cited by 2 publications

References 0 publications

Der Schwangerschaftsabbruch in Deutschland – eine Zusammenfassung nach über 25 Jahren der Anwendung des 1995 reformierten § 218 StGB

Der Schwangerschaftsabbruch in Deutschland – eine Zusammenfassung nach über 25 Jahren der Anwendung des 1995 reformierten § 218 StGB

Who can talk about abortion? Information, offence, freedom of speech, and the advertising ban in Germany

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About