2008
DOI: 10.1016/j.actamat.2008.02.046
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Dislocation structures and their relationship to strength in deformed nickel microcrystals

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

10
153
1

Year Published

2010
2010
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
7
2

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 301 publications
(164 citation statements)
references
References 35 publications
10
153
1
Order By: Relevance
“…In addition, dislocations are also visible. The dislocation density can be roughly calculated by the line intercept method [44], by drawing five random lines through the TEM images with total length Lr and counting the number of the intersection points N, with the following equation:…”
Section: Uniaxial Tensile Testmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In addition, dislocations are also visible. The dislocation density can be roughly calculated by the line intercept method [44], by drawing five random lines through the TEM images with total length Lr and counting the number of the intersection points N, with the following equation:…”
Section: Uniaxial Tensile Testmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Up to now, different modelling approaches have been proposed to characterise phenomena observed in compression of nano-and micron-sized pillars, such as a source-truncation model [19], a source-exhaustion hardening model [20], multiplication via a single-arm source operation [19,21], a weakest-link theory [22] and a dislocation-starvation/dislocation-nucleation theory [23]. The general premise of these theories is to represent dislocation-source operations in a discrete fashion, where strength of samples is linked to the source lengths.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…So far, FIB-less fabrication methods have only been able to produce features without dislocations, thereby rendering theoretical strengths, regardless of size, not surprising. Pillars fabricated by FIB, in contrast, contain as many as 10 13 dislocations per m 2 [32]. Therefore, in order to understand what drives the size effect, it is imperative to mechanically test pillars produced via FIB-less fabrication methods yet with nonzero dislocation densities.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%