2011
DOI: 10.1016/j.scriptamat.2011.05.005
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Dislocations, boundaries and slip systems in cube grains of rolled aluminium

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

3
18
0

Year Published

2015
2015
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
10

Relationship

2
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 41 publications
(21 citation statements)
references
References 13 publications
3
18
0
Order By: Relevance
“…This conclusion is in full agreement with a previous comparison of predicted and observed dislocation networks in the Type 2 cell structure of tensile deformed aluminium grains with the tensile axis near <100> [40].…”
Section: Leds Charactersupporting
confidence: 92%
“…This conclusion is in full agreement with a previous comparison of predicted and observed dislocation networks in the Type 2 cell structure of tensile deformed aluminium grains with the tensile axis near <100> [40].…”
Section: Leds Charactersupporting
confidence: 92%
“…The low twist angle between the two neighboring grains led to the formation of a screw dislocation network, where the individual dislocations were arranged orthogonally. Such type of interface structure was also observed by Schober [35] using electron microscopy in (110) [37,36]. It is to be noted that these observations are also in accordance with the dislocation networks observed in (110) [35] and (100) [38] twist GB interface in fcc Au and in (100) interface of other fcc metals like Ni [11,34] and Cu [39,40] as well.…”
Section: Configuration Of Twist Grain Boundarysupporting
confidence: 80%
“…The similar alignment was further linked to similarities in the activated slip systems [53] and correlated with changes in the flow stress upon a strain path change [54,55]. It follows that the dislocations gliding on these systems should be those accumulating in the dislocation boundaries, which has also been confirmed [56][57][58]. The subdivision by these dislocation boundaries alone can, however, not explain the presently observed orientation spread as the mean misorientation angle across such boundaries is about 1.3 in 10% deformed interstitialfree steel [59].…”
Section: Grain Orientation Vs Grain Interactionmentioning
confidence: 63%