2016
DOI: 10.1063/1.4947620
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Disordered spin dependent interactions in a spinor (S=1) Bose gas: A percolation analysis

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

1
6
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
2

Relationship

0
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 2 publications
(7 citation statements)
references
References 13 publications
1
6
0
Order By: Relevance
“…We used the DMRG algorithm to find the phase diagram of a chain of spinor bosons under two-and threebody interactions by calculating the chemical potential to add or remove one particle at the thermodynamic limit for different values of the hopping, when the parameters U 2 , V 0 << U 0 , and V 2 = 2 U2 U0 V 0 are fixed. Mean-field phase diagrams for this problem were recently reported by Nabi and Basu [44], and we show them in Fig. 4a and Fig.…”
Section: Numerical Resultssupporting
confidence: 69%
See 4 more Smart Citations
“…We used the DMRG algorithm to find the phase diagram of a chain of spinor bosons under two-and threebody interactions by calculating the chemical potential to add or remove one particle at the thermodynamic limit for different values of the hopping, when the parameters U 2 , V 0 << U 0 , and V 2 = 2 U2 U0 V 0 are fixed. Mean-field phase diagrams for this problem were recently reported by Nabi and Basu [44], and we show them in Fig. 4a and Fig.…”
Section: Numerical Resultssupporting
confidence: 69%
“…This figure shows us that a quantum phase transition from a superfluid state to a Mott insulator one will take place as the hopping parameter decreases as the two-and three-body interactions between spinor bosons are considered. The above conclusion is expected when we are studying interacting bosons; however, the most interesting problem is related to the phase diagram, for which recent mean-field studies suggest that the even-odd asymmetry always happens [44].…”
Section: Numerical Resultsmentioning
confidence: 67%
See 3 more Smart Citations