2004
DOI: 10.1080/01639620490431228
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

disowning our shadow: a psychoanalytic approach to understanding punitive public attitudes

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
23
0
2

Year Published

2008
2008
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
7
2

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 37 publications
(25 citation statements)
references
References 31 publications
0
23
0
2
Order By: Relevance
“…These findings need to be replicated elsewhere and future research could also include ‘expressive’ factors thought to impact punitive attitudes (Maruna, Matravers and King ; Tyler and Boeckmann ; Young ). It is pertinent to reiterate the specificity of the sample in this study.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 96%
“…These findings need to be replicated elsewhere and future research could also include ‘expressive’ factors thought to impact punitive attitudes (Maruna, Matravers and King ; Tyler and Boeckmann ; Young ). It is pertinent to reiterate the specificity of the sample in this study.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 96%
“…It implicates Freud's psychic system of the id, ego, and superego, reconceptualized by subsequent analysts such as Jung (1964) and Klein (1985). However, the phrase, the criminology of the shadow, is a relatively recent expression used to account for punitive public attitudes (Maruna, Matravers, & King, 2004) and, to a lesser extent, the underlying psychoanalytic dimensions of Garland's (2001) thesis on the culture of control and penal policy . However, as appropriated in this article, the phrase is associated more with elucidating the absent but felt contours of criminal justice more generally.…”
Section: On the Criminology Of The Shadowmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…239-254) and that 11. Maruna et al (2004) aptly summarize a number of the main apprehensions with appropriating the psychoanalytic lens when investigating crime and justice issues. Among others, they note the framework's "failure to meet Popperian standards for falsification; lack of conceptual limits; [and] masculine bias… ."…”
Section: On the Criminology Of The Shadowmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Many types of context, operating at macro, local and individual levels, have been considered relevant. For example, Maruna et al (2004) have argued that punitive public attitudes towards (suspected) offenders cannot be easily explained by specific experiences of neighbourhood crime, but may be a symptom of free-floated anxieties relating more broadly to macro-and locallevel social change. Kearns and Bannister (2009) have argued that negative attitudes towards young people can be viewed within the context of a growing public and political discourse of intolerance and calls for greater conformity.…”
Section: Contextualising Pasbmentioning
confidence: 99%