2019
DOI: 10.1016/j.watres.2018.12.045
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Disparate effects of DOM extracted from coastal seawaters and freshwaters on photodegradation of 2,4-Dihydroxybenzophenone

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

2
21
0
2

Year Published

2020
2020
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

3
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 73 publications
(25 citation statements)
references
References 62 publications
2
21
0
2
Order By: Relevance
“…The quantum yields of 3 DOM * ( 3DOM * ) from SRFA and SRNOM were determined to be (4.66 ± 0.10) × 10 −3 and (4.07 ± 0.16) × 10 −3 , respectively ( Table 1 ), which is in the same order of magnitude as reported in a previous study ( Wang et al, 2019 ). After UV irradiation, the 3DOM * of SRFA and SRNOM decreased to be (3.84 ± 0.06) × 10 −3 and (3.79 ± 0.10) × 10 −3 , respectively ( Fig.…”
Section: Effect Of Uv/chlorine Treatment On 3 Dom * Generation From Srfa and Srnomsupporting
confidence: 77%
“…The quantum yields of 3 DOM * ( 3DOM * ) from SRFA and SRNOM were determined to be (4.66 ± 0.10) × 10 −3 and (4.07 ± 0.16) × 10 −3 , respectively ( Table 1 ), which is in the same order of magnitude as reported in a previous study ( Wang et al, 2019 ). After UV irradiation, the 3DOM * of SRFA and SRNOM decreased to be (3.84 ± 0.06) × 10 −3 and (3.79 ± 0.10) × 10 −3 , respectively ( Fig.…”
Section: Effect Of Uv/chlorine Treatment On 3 Dom * Generation From Srfa and Srnomsupporting
confidence: 77%
“…Compared with the DOM extracted from freshwater, the value of SUVA254 in this study was admittedly lower, indicated autochthonous-dominated DOM origin (Wang et al, 2019). E2/E3 as a surrogate of the relative molecular weight of humic solutes was calculated to evaluate the relative size of DOM molecules (Helms et al, 2008;Wang et al, 2019). The value of E2/E3 for SDOM was higher than the humic substance fractions as reported before (Peuravuori and Pihlaja, 1997;Lou et al, 2006;, which indicated its lower average molecular weight.…”
Section: Absorption Spectra Analysismentioning
confidence: 45%
“…根据产生方式, S-DOM以微生物源为主导 [65] . 对于 微生物源占比高的S-DOM, 其Φ PPRIs 也比淡水陆源 DOM高 [65] , 而PPRIs的稳态浓度却比淡水陆源DOM低, 这主要由于S-DOM经历了长时间的光漂白作用, 导致 图 3 根据仪器表征结果推断的不同来源DOM的结构模型 [68,69] .…”
Section: 不同来源Dom对omps光降解的影响 机理unclassified
“…根据产生方式, S-DOM以微生物源为主导 [65] . 对于 微生物源占比高的S-DOM, 其Φ PPRIs 也比淡水陆源 DOM高 [65] , 而PPRIs的稳态浓度却比淡水陆源DOM低, 这主要由于S-DOM经历了长时间的光漂白作用, 导致 图 3 根据仪器表征结果推断的不同来源DOM的结构模型 [68,69] . (a) 风化褐煤(leonardite)腐殖酸; (b) 富羧基的脂肪族分子; (c) 木质素衍生物 Figure 3 Molecular structural models proposed for DOM derived from different sources based on instrumental characterization [68,69] .…”
Section: 不同来源Dom对omps光降解的影响 机理unclassified