2014
DOI: 10.1016/j.poly.2014.07.039
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Disparate reactivity from isomeric {Me 2 C(CH 2 N CHpy) 2 } and {Me 2 C(CH NCH 2 py) 2 } chelates in iron complexation

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
2

Citation Types

0
11
0

Year Published

2015
2015
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

6
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 8 publications
(11 citation statements)
references
References 64 publications
0
11
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Subsequent dimerization via attack of the nucleophilic eneamide on the electrophilic imine of another titanium intermediate would lead directly to 3 . Related nucleophile/electrophile couplings of 1,3-di-(2-pyridyl)-2-azaallyl (smif) constituents and others have been postulated as nonradical alternatives in the C–C bond forming steps illustrated in Figure .…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Subsequent dimerization via attack of the nucleophilic eneamide on the electrophilic imine of another titanium intermediate would lead directly to 3 . Related nucleophile/electrophile couplings of 1,3-di-(2-pyridyl)-2-azaallyl (smif) constituents and others have been postulated as nonradical alternatives in the C–C bond forming steps illustrated in Figure .…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Carbon–carbon bond formation is often a consequence of redox noninnocence (RNI) that induces radical character in certain ligands. In many cases, a relatively simple coupling of carbon radicals occurs to form a single new bond, but sometimes the reactivity can be complicated. Figure illustrates some unusual C–C bond forming events discovered in these laboratories. In A , the Ti­(III) complex, (smif)­{Li­(smif–smif)}­Ti, was shown to contain one C–C bond derived from coupling of smif (smif = 1,3-di­(2-pyridyl)-2-azaallyl) ligands that were reduced during the course of its synthesis. One mode of its decomposition generated dimer [(smif 2– )­Ti III ] 2 (μ-κ 3 ,κ 3 - N , N (py) 2 -smif,smif), which contained two new C–C bonds that can be construed as arising from coupling of a singlet diradical, or alternatively, a nucleophile/electrophile coupling .…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 98%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…35 Incorporating PI precursors into a nacnac framework 36−39 permitted the isolation of carbon radical character, leading to C−C bond formation (C), 40 but in related tetradentate ligands, electrostatic stabilization of a 14e − π-system afforded very stable Fe(II) complexes (D). 41,42 Finally, a tetradentate di-PI ligand revealed five redox states (E) that were quite stable, while the metal formally remained Ni(II). 6 The successful implementation of 2-azaallyls 34, 35,40,43 in bondforming processes 44−47 prompted an investigation into corresponding 1-azaallyls, 15,46−49 recognizing that such entities are ene-amides that can be readily prepared via condensation routes.…”
Section: ■ Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The formation of a cyclopropanated backbone of (dadi) n suggested that reversible C–C bond formation could be a means of storing and releasing electrons in a redox noninnocent (RNI) fashion. , A possible hindrance to RNI is the transfer of a cyclopropane hydrogen subsequent to ring-opening, which would generate a nacnac fragment in place of the original diimine. The reactivity of {PhC 3 H 3 (-NC 6 H 4 -2-NAr) 2 }­Ti­(THF) ( 3 ) was probed via various potential oxidants and proton acceptors, and while most generated mixtures, the addition of Ph 2 CN 2 yielded a single product (>90%) that was dissymmetric.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%