Disparities in Coverage of Adult Immunization among Older Adults in India

Abstract

A lack of a universal adult immunization scheme in India poses a challenge to achieve universal health coverage. Healthcare disparity is one of the biggest challenges in low- and middle-income countries such as India. We aimed to estimate the disparities in coverage of various adult vaccines among older adults in India using nationally representative data. An observational analysis among 31,464 participants aged ≥60 years from the Longitudinal Ageing Study in India, 2017–2018, was conducted. Vaccination coverage across wealth quintiles and selected non-communicable diseases were reported as frequencies and weighted proportions along with their 95% confidence intervals as a measure of uncertainty. The highest coverage was of the diphtheria and tetanus vaccine (2.75%) followed by typhoid (1.84%), hepatitis B (1.82%), influenza (1.59%), and pneumococcal (0.74%). The most affluent groups had a higher coverage of all vaccines. Participants having high cholesterol, psychiatric conditions, and cancer had the highest coverage of all vaccines. Overall, a very low coverage of all vaccines was observed. The coverage was influenced by social determinants of health, depicting a disparity in accessing immunization. Hence, at-risk groups such as the deprived and multimorbid patients need to be covered under the ambit of free immunization to achieve universal health coverage.

A Multicenter Evaluation of Overall Susceptibility and Antimicrobial Resistance Among Streptococcus pneumoniae Isolates

“…In India, PCV is administered in children in three doses (two as primary doses and one as a booster dose) at six weeks, 14 weeks, and nine months. However, India has not yet fully implemented adult vaccination programs and these vaccines are underutilized since there is no clear mandate requiring all adults to receive vaccinations [ 26 , 27 ]. Although the vaccines are advocated for and recommended globally for the elderly population at risk, their use in the region is suboptimal and heavily dependent on clinicians' knowledge of guidelines [ 5 ].…”

Inequality in Immunization: Holding on to Equity as We ‘Catch Up’

“…The Special Issue features research, reviews, and commentaries that span a range of immunization topics and populations. While there is an emphasis on childhood vaccinations [ 15 , 16 , 17 , 18 ]—exploring inequalities in DTP and measles-containing vaccine (MCV) coverage [ 19 , 20 , 21 , 22 , 23 ] and patterns of inequality in unvaccinated or zero-dose children [ 24 , 25 , 26 , 27 , 28 , 29 ]—contributions also cover inequalities in adult immunization [ 30 ], including protection of pregnant women and their newborns against tetanus [ 31 ] and COVID-19 vaccination [ 32 , 33 ].…”

“…An encouraging observation while putting together this Special Issue has been the use of a variety of data sources to assess immunization inequalities. Studies have made use of traditional sources of immunization data like administrative data [ 19 , 23 , 32 ] and population surveys [ 18 , 21 , 22 , 27 , 29 , 30 ] (including Demographic and Health Surveys and/or Multiple Indicator Cluster Surveys [ 15 , 20 , 31 ]), while several other studies explored the potential of novel sources such as geospatial data [ 24 , 25 ], electronic immunization registries [ 34 ], dialogues [ 16 ], country appraisals and reports [ 35 ], and funding proposals [ 26 ]. Three review studies relied on synthesis and structured analyses drawing from a multitude of existing studies [ 17 , 33 , 36 ].…”

“…As dimensions of inequality present themselves and intersect in dynamic ways, our modes of understanding must keep up. Several studies in this Special Issue examined multiple dimensions of immunization inequality [ 18 , 19 , 21 , 27 , 29 , 31 , 33 , 36 ], while others focused on specific dimensions, such as gender barriers [ 20 , 34 ] or socioeconomic status [ 15 , 30 , 32 ].…”