2019
DOI: 10.1097/brs.0000000000003365
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Disparities in Outcomes by Insurance Payer Groups for Patients Undergoing Anterior Cervical Discectomy and Fusion

Abstract: Study Design. Retrospective, observational study of clinical outcomes at a single institution. Objective. To compare postoperative complication and readmission rates of payer groups in a cohort of patients undergoing anterior cervical discectomy and fusion (ACDF). Summary of Background Data. Studies examining associations between primary payer and outcomes in spine surgery have been equivocal. … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

3
49
1

Year Published

2020
2020
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 32 publications
(53 citation statements)
references
References 25 publications
3
49
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Five pre-operative SDoH variables were selected based on the Commission on Social Determinants of Health Final Report published by World Health Organization [22]. The variables included race/ethnicity, educational attainment, employment status, insurance payer, and gender, which were dichotomized based on previous research findings [4,17,[23][24][25][26] to improve interpretability of findings.…”
Section: Study Variablesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Five pre-operative SDoH variables were selected based on the Commission on Social Determinants of Health Final Report published by World Health Organization [22]. The variables included race/ethnicity, educational attainment, employment status, insurance payer, and gender, which were dichotomized based on previous research findings [4,17,[23][24][25][26] to improve interpretability of findings.…”
Section: Study Variablesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…As a result, the smaller patient cohort size and single health care system setting limits the generalizability of our findings to other locations. In addition, variables important to spine surgery disparities, such as socioeconomic and insurance status, were not included within the analysis 22,23. However, although these variables have been independent predictors of increased LOS and cost, they likely reflect lower preoperative health status and postoperative support 24.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In addition, variables important to spine surgery disparities, such as socioeconomic and insurance status, were not included within the analysis. 22,23 However, although these variables have been independent predictors of increased LOS and cost, they likely reflect lower preoperative health status and postoperative support. 24 This idea fits with our previously mentioned finding that AA patients required higher rates of discharge to subacute rehabilitation facilities following ACDF, which has also been shown in other studies.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“… 6 In a recent evaluation of patients undergoing ACDF (all indications) from a single US center over 8 years (N = 2387), state-funded (Medicare / Medicaid) patients had more co-morbidities, longer hospitalization, and more frequently returned for reassessment within 90 days than insurance funded patients. 37 Taken together, this suggests that SES is likely an important determining factor of treatment costs and outcomes as well as a potential sources of unconsciousness bias during the decision making process for the individual’s treatment.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%