2008
DOI: 10.1002/cncr.24007
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Disparities in survival among women with invasive cervical cancer

Abstract: N‐Chlorination reactions of alkyl‐, cycloalkyl‐, heterocyclic, and aromatic amines by HOCl have been investigated in the gas and aqueous phase. Density functional (B3LYP), double hybrid (B2PLYPD), and composite theoretical model (G3B3) have been used to assess steric, electronic, and solvent effects on the reactivity of different families of amines toward HOCl. When solvent effects are included by using CPCM/UAHF model, all computational methods predict the same order of reactivity within each group of amines.… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

5
89
2
2

Year Published

2009
2009
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
10

Relationship

2
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 95 publications
(98 citation statements)
references
References 57 publications
(40 reference statements)
5
89
2
2
Order By: Relevance
“…Moreover, household incomes typically differed by less than $3000 in such, respective, extremely poor urban neighborhoods of America and Canada. Perhaps not surprisingly, very extreme affluence was a bit more prevalent in the California sample, but on both sides of the border, this study's definition seemed to converge quite closely with contemporary definitions of extreme affluence (e.g., less than 5% poor or typical incomes of $75,000 to $100,000 or more; Barrett et al, 2008;Brookfield et al, 2009;Henry et al, 2009;Lee and Marlay, 2007). 2.1.2.…”
Section: Extremely Poor and Extremely Affluent Neighborhoods-statisticssupporting
confidence: 60%
“…Moreover, household incomes typically differed by less than $3000 in such, respective, extremely poor urban neighborhoods of America and Canada. Perhaps not surprisingly, very extreme affluence was a bit more prevalent in the California sample, but on both sides of the border, this study's definition seemed to converge quite closely with contemporary definitions of extreme affluence (e.g., less than 5% poor or typical incomes of $75,000 to $100,000 or more; Barrett et al, 2008;Brookfield et al, 2009;Henry et al, 2009;Lee and Marlay, 2007). 2.1.2.…”
Section: Extremely Poor and Extremely Affluent Neighborhoods-statisticssupporting
confidence: 60%
“…Leaving individuals to bear the cost for such lifesaving preventive and therapeutic services, implicitly limits the utilization of cervical cancer services which could contribute to the late presentation in advanced stages with dismal survival probability. Even in developed societies were treatment facilities are available, cost related factors, health insurance, low levels of health literacy, lack of social support and transportation barriers have limiting effects on patients receiving care in a timely fashion 4,[13][14][15][16][17] . It is therefore imperative to look closely at the options for improving cervical cancer health outcomes in Nigeria and similar settings in Africa in the perspective of societal rather than individual investments.…”
Section: Societal Investment and Cervical Cancer Outcomesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Failure to engage with a structured screening programme has been indentified as one of the major risk factors for developing a malignancy and this raises the concern that this population of women may continue this behavioural pattern after their diagnosis, being less likely to comply with treatment for their premature menopause. The reasons for such behaviour will of course be multi-factorial however it is known that the majority of women who develop a cervical cancer belong to the most deprived socioeconomic quintile [31], which raises the possibility that a lack of health education is a significant contributing factor. Social isolation and factors that result in a lack of engagement with health care, either due to alcohol abuse or a language barrier, have been shown to be associated with emergency routes of presentation for cervical cancer and advanced disease at diagnosis [32].…”
Section: Population Characteristicsmentioning
confidence: 99%