1987
DOI: 10.1161/01.cir.75.6.1310
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Disparity between ejection and end-systolic indexes of left ventricular contractility in mitral regurgitation.

Abstract: To examine left ventricular function in mitral regurgitation (MR), we compared the ejection phase indexes of left ventricular contractility with maximal systolic elastance (Emax)

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
23
0

Year Published

1988
1988
2013
2013

Publication Types

Select...
7
3

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 62 publications
(24 citation statements)
references
References 57 publications
1
23
0
Order By: Relevance
“…This value compares well with those found in the isolated heart, 6.6 mm Hg/ml 7 and 3.6 mm Hg/ml, 24 as well as in the intact dog (obtained with vena cava occlusion), 5.8±3.6 mm Hg/ml, 17 4.7±2.3 mm Hg/ml, 22 7.7 ±2.9 mm Hg/ml, 23 5.1 and 6.7 mm Hg/ml (with and without autonomic blockade, respectively), 27 and 4.6 ± 2.5 mm Hg/ml. 20 In contrast, Ees found by aortic occlusion, an intervention not studied by others, was 1.37 ±0.45 kPa/ml or 10.3 ± 3.4 mm Hg/ml, exceeding all of the above values. Hypothetically, the conductance method measuring LV volume, in itself, may have caused some differences in slopes of the ESPVR with the two load interventions because of its slight sensitivity to the contents of the right heart.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 57%
“…This value compares well with those found in the isolated heart, 6.6 mm Hg/ml 7 and 3.6 mm Hg/ml, 24 as well as in the intact dog (obtained with vena cava occlusion), 5.8±3.6 mm Hg/ml, 17 4.7±2.3 mm Hg/ml, 22 7.7 ±2.9 mm Hg/ml, 23 5.1 and 6.7 mm Hg/ml (with and without autonomic blockade, respectively), 27 and 4.6 ± 2.5 mm Hg/ml. 20 In contrast, Ees found by aortic occlusion, an intervention not studied by others, was 1.37 ±0.45 kPa/ml or 10.3 ± 3.4 mm Hg/ml, exceeding all of the above values. Hypothetically, the conductance method measuring LV volume, in itself, may have caused some differences in slopes of the ESPVR with the two load interventions because of its slight sensitivity to the contents of the right heart.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 57%
“…Previous work has also shown substantial disparity between EF and end-systolic indexes of LV contractility in the presence of MR. 34 Interestingly, neither load-independent parameters of LV contractility nor EF demonstrated a clinically relevant correlation to cardiac output, indicating that the improvement in hemodynamic status is achieved through the reduction of regurgitant flow rather than any substantial changes in LV contractility.…”
Section: Effects Of Percutaneous Mvr On LV Contractilitymentioning
confidence: 92%
“…The end-systolic stress-volume ratio might be more useful than the end-systolic volume alone, but in chronically remodeled hearts, this ratio, like systolic elastance, requires consideration of body size and LV geometry. 16,22 These and other indices of function certainly can be useful in many circumstances, but the EF appears to be the most clinically relevant index of LV systolic function in MR, and it provides a scientifically valid and clinically reliable index on which to base management decisions.…”
Section: Ejection Fractionmentioning
confidence: 99%