2017
DOI: 10.1007/978-3-319-54427-4_10
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Disparity Estimation by Simultaneous Edge Drawing

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
9
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
4
2
2

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 12 publications
(9 citation statements)
references
References 20 publications
0
9
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The MT-TW-SMNet achieved better overall tele-wide disparity estimation accuracy than the SIDENet. Our multitask tele-wide disparity estimation also ranks on the KITTI leader board better than other methods which use full wide left and right images for stereo disparity estimation, such as [50]- [52]. The table also shows that with fusion between the different methods (MT-TW Fusion), the result can be further improved so the overall disparity error is only 11.96% 1 .…”
Section: B Performance Comparisons Between Tw-smnet Shg-sidenet Anmentioning
confidence: 80%
“…The MT-TW-SMNet achieved better overall tele-wide disparity estimation accuracy than the SIDENet. Our multitask tele-wide disparity estimation also ranks on the KITTI leader board better than other methods which use full wide left and right images for stereo disparity estimation, such as [50]- [52]. The table also shows that with fusion between the different methods (MT-TW Fusion), the result can be further improved so the overall disparity error is only 11.96% 1 .…”
Section: B Performance Comparisons Between Tw-smnet Shg-sidenet Anmentioning
confidence: 80%
“…The other one is to compare with SED (Simultaneous Edge Drawing) [ 19 ], another sparse matching method based on edges. The of SED is only.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Dexmont Peña et al [ 19 ] extended the Edge Drawing (ED) algorithm on stereo pairs, matched only a few anchor points and then propagated disparities along the edges. Using the proposed method, the number of computations can be greatly decreased.…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Since a large set of (a) training (b) testing Figure 9. Comparison with the top ten approaches on the Middlebury Stereo Evaluation site [29]: SED [23], R-NCC (unpublished work), r200high [15], ICSG [33], SGM [11], DF (unpublished work), MotionStereo (unpublished work), IDR [17], TMAP [28] and SNCC [6]. Performances of different approaches on both training (a) and testing (b) datasets are plotted on non-occlusion error rates v.s.…”
Section: Matching-net Evaluation-net Attributes Kernel Size Quantitymentioning
confidence: 99%