2018
DOI: 10.1111/socf.12487
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Dispatches From Along the Veil: Stories of Racial Rejection

Abstract: In the wake of both long-standing frustration with, and objective levels of, race, gender, and class exclusion in academic societies, I dive into a professional diary I have collected over the years. I demonstrate nine interactional patterns culled from my own experiences alongside the Du Boisian "veil." Such social forces are often considered esoteric and inaccessible due to racial hierarchies, elite gatekeeping, and methodological constraints. I read these patterns as mechanisms in the reproduction of a raci… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
3

Relationship

0
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 3 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 46 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Rejection can be an unpleasant, painful, and demoralizing experience, more so within the context of racial bias. 1,2 Professionals should be appointed to positions through a meritocratic process where the best and most qualified person is selected. It sounds simple, but, unfortunately, it is not always so.…”
Section: Reflection/after Thoughts/insights Strategies and Solutionsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Rejection can be an unpleasant, painful, and demoralizing experience, more so within the context of racial bias. 1,2 Professionals should be appointed to positions through a meritocratic process where the best and most qualified person is selected. It sounds simple, but, unfortunately, it is not always so.…”
Section: Reflection/after Thoughts/insights Strategies and Solutionsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The impacts are often disproportionately felt by countries and universities with fewer economic resources, exacerbating existing inequalities (Walters 2018). Other barriers experienced by potential attendees include discrimination and/or inaccessibility based on gender (Biggs et al 2018, Jackson 2019, Nicolazzo & Jourian 2020, race (Hughey 2019, Miles et al 2020, nationality (Aguirre 2020), ethnicity (Ford et al 2019, Timperley et al 2020, native language (McCarthy et al 2004), disabilities (De Picker 2020), personality (McCarthy et al 2004, Davis & Warfield 2011, risk of sexual misconduct (National Academies of Sciences, Engineering, and Medicine 2018, Sharoni 2018) and external responsibilities, such as caring for children or other family members (Eckhaus andDavidovitch, 2018, Henderson &Moreau 2020).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%