2014
DOI: 10.7861/clinmedicine.14-3-239
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Dispelling myths about coagulation abnormalities in internal medicine

Abstract: The clotting screen is an 'integral' part of the routine blood tests in most medical wards. It is likely that only with the increasing requests for prothrombin time and activated partial thromboplastin time are abnormal results noted. Interpretation of these results requires good understanding of the coagulation system and problems with the laboratory analysis. Due to variable understanding of this complex system, many misconceptions have arisen in relation to the clinical effects expected from abnormal clotti… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

2016
2016
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
3
1

Relationship

0
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 4 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 37 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The failure to recognize that the hypothetical patient was anticoagulated and that it was not safe to perform an invasive procedure is most likely related to a poor understanding of the limitations of routine coagulation tests applied to a patient taking a DOAC. Poor understanding of the limitations of routine coagulation tests in clinical situations has been well documented previously . Routine coagulation screening tests do not predict perioperative bleeding , and prolonged clotting times occur in some prevalent conditions with no increased bleeding, such as antiphospholipid syndrome and factor XII deficiency.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The failure to recognize that the hypothetical patient was anticoagulated and that it was not safe to perform an invasive procedure is most likely related to a poor understanding of the limitations of routine coagulation tests applied to a patient taking a DOAC. Poor understanding of the limitations of routine coagulation tests in clinical situations has been well documented previously . Routine coagulation screening tests do not predict perioperative bleeding , and prolonged clotting times occur in some prevalent conditions with no increased bleeding, such as antiphospholipid syndrome and factor XII deficiency.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Most of those previous investigations associated prothrombin time with adenomyosis (34) but not directly with menorrhagia. However, prolonged PT and normal aPTT may re ect vitamin K de ciency caused by malnutrition, biliary obstruction, malabsorption syndromes, antibiotic use, or liver disease, which lowers clotting factor synthesis (35). The prothrombin time test evaluates the extrinsic coagulation pathway (also known as the tissue factor pathway), which comprises factors VII, X, V, and II, while the aPTT evaluates the intrinsic pathway (also known as the ampli cation pathway or contact system), which consists of factors XII, XI, IX, VIII, X, V, and II(36).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Evaluation of patients with bleeding tendency with abnormal prothrombin and activated partial thromboplastin times (PT and aPTT) can be straightforward with common causes include anticoagulant use, disseminated intravascular coagulation (DIC), liver disease, and vitamin K deficiency [ 1 ]. Acquired inhibitors (antibodies) or deficiencies of prothrombin, fibrinogen, factor V, or factor X clotting factors might rarely be the presenting feature of malignancy or autoimmune disease [ 1 ]. Patients with multiple myeloma may have associated clotting factors deficiency especially if associated with AL amyloidosis [ 2 , 3 ].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%