“…[ 93,100,119,268 ] For reasons not fully understood, this strategy appears to be less viable in TiO 2 , possibly due to the reduced number of sites available for co‐doping, which may be connected to a reduced tolerance of the anatase/rutile lattice to doping in comparison to perovskites, [ 265,268 ] as well as possible resistance of the natural defect chemistry of TiO 2 to co‐doping. [ 269 ] An additional factor which may distinguish Rh‐doped and La,Rh‐co‐doped SrTiO 3 from a host of inefficacious analogs is the strong p‐type character observed in both materials, [ 93,100,265,270 ] the origin of which has not yet been satisfactorily explained for the materials, given the electronic structures predicted by predicted by density functional theory (DFT). [ 264,271 ] Of note, more narrow bandgap photoelectrode materials have also been subject to doping to further reduce the bandgap and therefore improve light harvesting, including BiVO 4 .…”