2007
DOI: 10.1111/j.2006.0908-8857.03712.x
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Dispersal and recruitment during population growth in a colonial bird, the great cormorantPhalacrocorax carbo sinensis

Abstract: While the factors influencing reproduction and survival in colonial populations are relatively well studied, factors involved in dispersal and settlement decisions are not well understood. The present study investigated exchanges of great cormorants Phalacrocorax carbo sinensis among six breeding colonies over a 13‐year period when the breeding population in Denmark increased from 2800 to 36 400 nests. We used a multistate capture‐recapture model that combined multisite resightings and recoveries to examine si… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

2
67
0
1

Year Published

2008
2008
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
6
2

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 83 publications
(70 citation statements)
references
References 45 publications
2
67
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…The distance of reproductive dispersion in this study was 4.6 km, which is close to main natal dispersion in this study (4.21 km). Results from other research have also shown that natal dispersion is more common and individuals travel larger distances when compared to reproductive dispersion (Vergara et al 2006, Hénaux et al 2007, Itonaga 2009.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 86%
“…The distance of reproductive dispersion in this study was 4.6 km, which is close to main natal dispersion in this study (4.21 km). Results from other research have also shown that natal dispersion is more common and individuals travel larger distances when compared to reproductive dispersion (Vergara et al 2006, Hénaux et al 2007, Itonaga 2009.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 86%
“…However, our modelling framework is flexible enough to allow additional sophistication of the model as well as more complex, real-life scenarios to be investigated in the future. For instance, future versions of the model could accommodate the possibility of density-dependent survival (Frederiksen and Bregnballe, 2000; but see also Frederiksen et al, 2001) and the possibility that cormorants, particularly first-time breeders, use public information to select a breeding colony (Henaux et al, 2007). More realistic scenarios may include irregular spatial grids with unequal spacing between active colonies, and the fact that different colonies may have different carrying capacities and/or be at different stages of their dynamics.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Specifically, our aims were as follows: (i) to present a deterministic stage-structured metapopulation model parameterized for the cormorant. Our model represents a step beyond the works of Blackwell et al (2002) who developed a single population model and Duerr (2007) whose metapopulation model, parameterized for cormorant colonies in the Lake Champlain, lacked an explicit spatial context which is necessary to accommodate distance-dependent dispersal as evidenced in the closely related great cormorant (Henaux et al, 2007); (ii) as our model was designed to be an effective strategic and management decision tool, we also developed simulation tools to gain insight into the efficiency gain that could be expected from a better coordination of management activities in space and time; (iii) our modelling framework was applied to a case study in which we investigated the relative importance of the spatiotemporal location and degree of clustering of specific management activities on management efficiency.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…social information; Schjørring et al 2000, Hénaux et al 2007). Moreover, experience and familiarity of a nesting site is related to higher reproductive success, where knowing your neighbors decreases territorial aggression and knowledge of nearby feeding grounds makes foraging more efficient (Piper 2011).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%