2003
DOI: 10.1016/s1353-2561(02)00066-x
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Dispersion and Sorption of Oil Spills by Emulsifier-Modified Expanded Perlite

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4

Citation Types

1
26
0
1

Year Published

2005
2005
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
1
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 57 publications
(28 citation statements)
references
References 4 publications
1
26
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…The conventional methods for oil spill cleanup are booms, in situ burning, dispersant, oil skimmers, and sorbent materials according to the variation in oil types, locations, and weather conditions. [1][2][3][4][5][6] Oil spill cleanup by sorbent material is the simplest method for surrounding oil spill area by transformation spilled liquid into semisolid phase or solid phase. 7 The important properties of an ideal sorbent material for oil spill cleanup are oleophilicity and hydrophobicity, excellent oil/water selectivity, floatable before and after oil sorption, and reusable.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The conventional methods for oil spill cleanup are booms, in situ burning, dispersant, oil skimmers, and sorbent materials according to the variation in oil types, locations, and weather conditions. [1][2][3][4][5][6] Oil spill cleanup by sorbent material is the simplest method for surrounding oil spill area by transformation spilled liquid into semisolid phase or solid phase. 7 The important properties of an ideal sorbent material for oil spill cleanup are oleophilicity and hydrophobicity, excellent oil/water selectivity, floatable before and after oil sorption, and reusable.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Some sorbents that have been widely studied by researchers are milkweed, kapok, cotton fiber [23], polypropylene [24], modified expanded perlite [25], exfoliated graphite [7,26], carbonized fir fibers [27], carbon fiber felts [28], and Sugi Bark Sorbent [29].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Another MSF material is developed by Luong et al using aluminium alloy A356 filled with silicon carbide hollow spheres (SiC) [1]. They reported that the compressive and plateau strengths were higher compared to aluminium/fly ash cenosphere metallic syntactic foam under uni-axial loading [9,10,13]. The compressive strengths of Al/SiC foams was recorded at 160 MPa, however for the Al/fly ash cenosphere this parameter was found to be only 75 MPa [10].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%