2000
DOI: 10.1029/1999gl010738
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Dispersion imposed limits on atmospheric gravity waves in the mesosphere: Observations from OH airglow

Abstract: Dispersion ConsiderationsAll other things being equal, a wave with higher intrinsic phase speed will carry proportionately more momentum flux than a wave with lower intrinsic phase speed. The airglow images are most sensitive to these high intrinsic phase speed waves.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

5
39
0

Year Published

2005
2005
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 40 publications
(44 citation statements)
references
References 11 publications
5
39
0
Order By: Relevance
“…To distinguish the peaks caused by gravity waves from those caused by noise or other structures, several criteria were adopted as follows: Individual gravity waves should have a power greater than 10% of the total spectrum. Intensity amplitude is greater than 0.5% but less than 10%. An intensity amplitude larger than 10% might be caused by cloud or other strong structures; horizontal wavelengths are more than 12 km but less than 100 km.Waves with horizontal wavelengths of more than 100 km might be caused by the Milky Way, and waves with horizontal wavelengths of less than 12 km are too small to be observed by the airglow imager, considering the thickness of the OH airglow layer [ Swenson et al ., ].…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…To distinguish the peaks caused by gravity waves from those caused by noise or other structures, several criteria were adopted as follows: Individual gravity waves should have a power greater than 10% of the total spectrum. Intensity amplitude is greater than 0.5% but less than 10%. An intensity amplitude larger than 10% might be caused by cloud or other strong structures; horizontal wavelengths are more than 12 km but less than 100 km.Waves with horizontal wavelengths of more than 100 km might be caused by the Milky Way, and waves with horizontal wavelengths of less than 12 km are too small to be observed by the airglow imager, considering the thickness of the OH airglow layer [ Swenson et al ., ].…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…We excluded waves with horizontal wavelengths of less than 20 km, which cannot be distinguished from structures caused by local instability, such as ripples, and those with horizontal wavelengths of more than 100 km, which cannot be quantified fully due to our procedures for removing image contamination by the Milky Way. We also excluded waves with vertical wavelengths of less than 12 km, which essentially are too small to be observed by the airglow imaging considering the thickness of the emission layer (Swenson et al, 2000), and more than 60 km, which also might be ducted waves.…”
Section: Wave Identificationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…3. Such waves are prone to be trapped in the atmosphere via highω reflection (Isler et al, 1997;Swenson et al, 2000;Marks and Eckermann, 1995), and the trapped waves carry no net vertical flux of horizontal momentum. To see how many of the waves events were likely trapped or evanescent waves instead of propagating waves, we show on the left panel of Fig.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%